Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Mar 29, 2018·Rogers Arena, Vancouver

Edmonton Oilers 1, Vancouver Canucks 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 71% of the time.

VAN winsEDM wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
EDM110014012136
VAN01018112230

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 11:33EDMConnor McDavidAssists: Andrej Sekera, Adam Larsson · Wrist, 0.10 xG1–0
  2. P2 15:14VANSam GagnerAssists: Daniel Sedin, Henrik Sedin · Wrist, 0.21 xG1–1
  3. P3 2:00VANDerrick PouliotGWGAssists: Nikolay Goldobin, Jussi Jokinen · Wrist, 0.11 xG1–2
Penalties (3)
  1. P2 12:33VANDarren Archibald: Interference2 min
  2. P2 18:11EDMJujhar Khaira: Tripping2 min
  3. P3 13:24VANHenrik Sedin: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

EDM00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0VAN
46% to win54% to win
← EDM attackVAN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Sedin won the faceoff against McDavid
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

EDMVAN
36Shots on goal30
3.6Expected goals2.2
63Shot attempts43
31Faceoffs won20
2Power plays1
2Penalty minutes4
16Hits22
6Blocked shots13
8Giveaways4
6Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. bestLucic – Strome – Puljujarvi9:42

    xG 0.52–0.21 (71%)attempts 11–5goals 0–0

  2. Rattie – Nugent-Hopkins – McDavid12:39

    xG 0.33–0.37 (47%)attempts 11–8goals 0–0

  3. Kassian – Pakarinen – Khaira6:00

    xG 0.45–0.57 (44%)attempts 7–6goals 0–1

  4. Aberg – Draisaitl – Caggiula10:56

    xG 0.61–0.74 (45%)attempts 11–12goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestBenning – Auvitu11:41

    xG 0.75–0.52 (59%)attempts 13–11goals 0–1

  2. Sekera – Russell14:56

    xG 0.56–0.53 (51%)attempts 9–10goals 0–0

  3. Larsson – Nurse19:30

    xG 0.86–0.91 (49%)attempts 19–17goals 0–1

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestJokinen – Horvat – Goldobin12:02

    xG 0.65–0.45 (59%)attempts 12–10goals 1–0

  2. Sedin – Sedin – Gagner10:26

    xG 0.58–0.59 (50%)attempts 8–11goals 1–1

  3. Boucher – Gaunce – Gaudette6:20

    xG 0.34–0.45 (43%)attempts 6–8goals 0–0

  4. Sutter – Archibald – Motte12:55

    xG 0.24–0.57 (30%)attempts 8–14goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBiega – Sautner10:06

    xG 0.80–0.58 (58%)attempts 10–12goals 1–0

  2. Edler – Stecher21:30

    xG 0.48–0.60 (44%)attempts 12–19goals 0–0

  3. Del Zotto – Pouliot15:07

    xG 0.33–1.34 (20%)attempts 12–19goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

VAN 2.2 xGEDM 3.6 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

VANEDM

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

VAN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line VAN is favoured, below it EDM. Dots are goals.

Excitement 21/100 · #1008 of 1271 this seasonSwing 1.07 · 3 goals in reachComeback index 30% (winner's lowest chance)
EDM 100%5050%50VAN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +26 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 71% of the time.

VAN winsEDM wins

Simulated goal difference (VAN − EDM), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).