Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Apr 5, 2018·Capital One Arena, Washington

Nashville Predators 4, Washington Capitals 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 54% of the time.

WSH winsNSH wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
NSH1817214429
WSH0621719332

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:17NSHCraig SmithPPAssists: Ryan Johansen, P.K. Subban · Backhand, 0.31 xG1–0
  2. P2 4:29WSHAlex OvechkinPPAssists: Evgeny Kuznetsov, John Carlson · Snap, 0.05 xG1–1
  3. P2 6:47WSHEvgeny KuznetsovPPAssists: Nicklas Backstrom, T.J. Oshie · Wrist, 0.06 xG1–2
  4. P2 14:03NSHCraig SmithAssists: Roman Josi, Kyle Turris · Wrist, 0.13 xG2–2
  5. P3 1:07WSHEvgeny KuznetsovUnassisted · Backhand, 0.02 xG2–3
  6. P3 8:19NSHRoman JosiPPAssists: Ryan Ellis, Kyle Turris · Slap, 0.07 xG3–3
  7. P3 14:33NSHRyan JohansenGWGAssists: Viktor Arvidsson, Ryan Ellis · Backhand, 0.24 xG4–3
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 3:51WSHNicklas Backstrom: Slashing2 min · PPG
  2. P1 7:03NSHRoman Josi: Interference2 min
  3. P2 3:43NSHRyan Johansen: Tripping2 min · PPG
  4. P2 6:31NSHP.K. Subban: Slashing2 min · PPG
  5. P3 2:25NSHKyle Turris: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  6. P3 6:22WSHMatt Niskanen: Tripping2 min · PPG
  7. P3 19:59NSHNick Bonino: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

NSH00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0WSH
46% to win54% to win
← NSH attackWSH attack →
  1. P1 20:00Johansen won the faceoff against Backstrom
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

NSHWSH
29Shots on goal32
2.6Expected goals2.3
63Shot attempts67
36Faceoffs won29
2Power plays5
10Penalty minutes4
27Hits24
16Blocked shots19
12Giveaways14
8Takeaways12

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestJohansen – Forsberg – Arvidsson12:45

    xG 0.81–0.44 (65%)attempts 14–14goals 1–0

  2. Bonino – Sissons – Hartman11:47

    xG 0.49–0.21 (70%)attempts 14–12goals 0–1

  3. Turris – Smith – Fiala11:10

    xG 0.34–0.29 (54%)attempts 15–11goals 1–0

  4. Fisher – Watson – Salomaki10:13

    xG 0.09–0.16 (37%)attempts 7–8goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestJosi – Ellis12:04

    xG 0.90–0.11 (89%)attempts 16–12goals 2–0

  2. Emelin – Irwin3:55

    xG 0.29–0.00 (100%)attempts 9–0goals 0–0

  3. Josi – Irwin4:34

    xG 0.18–0.13 (58%)attempts 7–5goals 0–0

Washington Capitals

Forward lines

  1. bestEller – Smith-Pelly – Connolly11:51

    xG 0.31–0.16 (65%)attempts 12–10goals 0–0

  2. Oshie – Backstrom – Burakovsky12:07

    xG 0.16–0.12 (57%)attempts 13–12goals 0–0

  3. Chiasson – Boyd – Stephenson3:03

    xG 0.13–0.20 (39%)attempts 4–5goals 0–0

  4. Boyd – Wilson – Stephenson3:33

    xG 0.10–0.35 (23%)attempts 7–7goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestNiskanen – Orlov19:11

    xG 0.53–0.28 (65%)attempts 15–11goals 0–0

  2. Orpik – Djoos10:27

    xG 0.19–0.31 (38%)attempts 12–10goals 0–0

  3. Carlson – Kempny17:03

    xG 0.32–0.44 (42%)attempts 17–22goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

WSH 2.3 xGNSH 2.6 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

WSHNSH

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

WSH's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line WSH is favoured, below it NSH. Dots are goals.

Excitement 80/100 · #266 of 1271 this seasonSwing 2.12 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 16% (winner's lowest chance)
NSH 100%5050%50WSH 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +41 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 54% of the time.

WSH winsNSH wins

Simulated goal difference (WSH − NSH), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).