Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Apr 5, 2018·Nationwide Arena, Columbus

Pittsburgh Penguins 5, Columbus Blue Jackets 4 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 50% of the time.

CBJ winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
PIT21801021411543
CBJ2101111801430

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 5:11CBJZach WerenskiAssists: Pierre-Luc Dubois, Artemi Panarin · Backhand, 0.05 xG0–1
  2. P1 10:26PITPhil KesselPPAssists: Justin Schultz, Sidney Crosby · Wrist, 0.06 xG1–1
  3. P1 12:39CBJMatt CalvertAssists: Jack Johnson · Backhand, 0.05 xG1–2
  4. P1 15:35PITPatric HornqvistAssists: Justin Schultz · Snap, 0.13 xG2–2
  5. P2 6:35CBJBoone JennerPPAssists: Thomas Vanek, Sonny Milano · Wrist, 0.17 xG2–3
  6. P3 2:58PITKris LetangPPAssists: Evgeni Malkin, Patric Hornqvist · Wrist, 0.04 xG3–3
  7. P3 8:25CBJCam AtkinsonAssists: Pierre-Luc Dubois, Artemi Panarin · Tip-in, 0.24 xG3–4
  8. P3 12:16PITConor ShearyAssists: Phil Kessel · Wrist, 0.01 xG4–4
  9. OT 1:06PITPhil KesselGWGUnassisted · Wrist, 0.11 xG5–4
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 8:09PITPatric Hornqvist: Boarding2 min
  2. P1 9:50CBJSeth Jones: Tripping2 min · PPG
  3. P2 4:59PITJamie Oleksiak: High sticking2 min · PPG
  4. P2 9:01PITBryan Rust: Tripping2 min
  5. P2 18:16CBJBoone Jenner: Hooking2 min
  6. P3 1:36CBJCam Atkinson: High sticking2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CBJ
46% to win54% to win
← PIT attackCBJ attack →
  1. P1 20:00Crosby won the faceoff against Dubois
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITCBJ
43Shots on goal30
2.6Expected goals2.5
69Shot attempts44
37Faceoffs won38
3Power plays3
6Penalty minutes6
14Hits30
9Blocked shots17
5Giveaways4
7Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestMalkin – Hornqvist – Hagelin9:36

    xG 1.02–0.15 (87%)attempts 19–2goals 1–0

  2. Kessel – Sheahan – Sheary8:08

    xG 0.34–0.17 (67%)attempts 10–7goals 0–1

  3. Crosby – Rust – Guentzel14:52

    xG 0.41–0.34 (55%)attempts 17–7goals 0–1

  4. Malkin – Hornqvist – Kessel3:37

    xG 0.06–0.12 (33%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSchultz – Maatta11:35

    xG 0.93–0.17 (85%)attempts 17–7goals 0–0

  2. Letang – Maatta2:26

    xG 0.13–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–0goals 0–0

  3. Schultz – Oleksiak3:57

    xG 0.22–0.11 (65%)attempts 3–3goals 1–0

Columbus Blue Jackets

Forward lines

  1. bestAtkinson – Panarin – Dubois16:15

    xG 0.90–0.48 (65%)attempts 13–17goals 2–0

  2. Vanek – Jenner – Wennberg9:54

    xG 0.35–0.29 (55%)attempts 9–8goals 0–1

  3. Letestu – Bjorkstrand – Milano3:23

    xG 0.02–0.06 (27%)attempts 1–4goals 0–0

  4. Dubinsky – Letestu – Calvert2:13

    xG 0.00–0.17 (0%)attempts 0–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestJones – Werenski14:30

    xG 0.41–0.28 (60%)attempts 9–13goals 1–1

  2. Murray – Jones4:29

    xG 0.23–0.22 (51%)attempts 5–8goals 0–0

  3. Johnson – Murray11:19

    xG 0.26–0.37 (41%)attempts 8–10goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CBJ 2.5 xGPIT 2.6 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CBJPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CBJ's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CBJ is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 96/100 · #61 of 1271 this seasonSwing 2.70 · 9 goals in reachComeback index 13% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50CBJ 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +31 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 50% of the time.

CBJ winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (CBJ − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).