Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Apr 5, 2018·STAPLES Center, Los Angeles

Minnesota Wild 4, Los Angeles Kings 5 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Los Angeles Kings win this game 69% of the time.

LAK winsMIN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
MIN2100421300427
LAK173140512528

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:55LAKDustin BrownAssists: Christian Folin, Tanner Pearson · Tip-in, 0.07 xG0–1
  2. P1 3:12MINRyan MurphyAssists: Nick Seeler, Daniel Winnik · Slap, 0.02 xG1–1
  3. P1 5:02MINMathew DumbaAssists: Mikael Granlund, Mikko Koivu · Slap, 0.01 xG2–1
  4. P2 7:42LAKDustin BrownPPAssists: Jeff Carter, Drew Doughty · Tip-in, 0.23 xG2–2
  5. P2 12:57LAKTobias RiederAssists: Christian Folin, Daniel Brickley · Tip-in, 0.09 xG2–3
  6. P2 19:10LAKDustin BrownAssists: Tanner Pearson, Alec Martinez · Wrist, 0.05 xG2–4
  7. P3 5:42MINEric StaalAssists: Mathew Dumba, Mikko Koivu · Slap, 0.06 xG3–4
  8. P3 9:24MINNate ProsserSHAssists: Mikko Koivu, Mikael Granlund · Wrist, 0.10 xG4–4
  9. OT 0:23LAKDustin BrownGWGAssists: Anze Kopitar · Wrist, 0.06 xG4–5
Penalties (13)
  1. P1 18:45LAKAnze Kopitar: Slashing2 min
  2. P2 2:07MINRyan Murphy: Tripping2 min
  3. P2 4:12MINNick Seeler: Roughing2 min
  4. P2 4:12LAKTanner Pearson: Cross checking2 min
  5. P2 6:35MINMarcus Foligno: Interference2 min · PPG
  6. P2 7:16MINMikko Koivu: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  7. P3 8:30MINEric Staal: Tripping2 min
  8. P3 10:49MINMarcus Foligno: Roughing2 min
  9. P3 10:49LAKKyle Clifford: Charging2 min
  10. P3 10:49LAKKyle Clifford: Roughing2 min
  11. P3 10:49MINMarcus Foligno: Roughing2 min
  12. P3 13:54MINCarson Soucy: Hooking2 min
  13. P3 14:46MINNino Niederreiter: Too many men on the ice2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MIN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0LAK
46% to win54% to win
← MIN attackLAK attack →
  1. P1 20:00Carter won the faceoff against Staal
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MINLAK
27Shots on goal28
1.8Expected goals2.8
52Shot attempts61
28Faceoffs won41
1Power plays6
18Penalty minutes8
28Hits22
18Blocked shots13
6Giveaways18
1Takeaways1

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestCoyle – Niederreiter – Eriksson Ek3:10

    xG 0.11–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–0goals 0–0

  2. Staal – Ennis – Zucker9:44

    xG 0.56–0.53 (51%)attempts 14–12goals 0–1

  3. Koivu – Parise – Granlund10:21

    xG 0.20–0.21 (49%)attempts 8–8goals 1–1

  4. Winnik – Foligno – Eriksson Ek4:17

    xG 0.03–0.12 (18%)attempts 3–4goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestProsser – Soucy8:43

    xG 0.23–0.07 (76%)attempts 7–7goals 0–0

  2. Murphy – Soucy3:43

    xG 0.01–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–0goals 0–0

  3. Prosser – Seeler2:26

    xG 0.02–0.02 (52%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

Los Angeles Kings

Forward lines

  1. bestBrown – Kopitar – Pearson13:40

    xG 0.88–0.34 (72%)attempts 18–9goals 2–1

  2. Thompson – Andreoff – Amadio5:53

    xG 0.08–0.03 (75%)attempts 7–4goals 0–1

  3. Lewis – Clifford – Kempe9:36

    xG 0.04–0.28 (12%)attempts 4–9goals 0–0

  4. Carter – Toffoli – Rieder10:01

    xG 0.19–0.48 (28%)attempts 6–15goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestFolin – Brickley7:42

    xG 0.20–0.04 (83%)attempts 6–4goals 1–0

  2. Phaneuf – Martinez12:40

    xG 0.50–0.39 (56%)attempts 13–11goals 0–1

  3. Martinez – Folin4:16

    xG 0.15–0.26 (36%)attempts 2–9goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

LAK 2.8 xGMIN 1.8 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

LAKMIN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

LAK's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line LAK is favoured, below it MIN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 96/100 · #71 of 1271 this seasonSwing 2.41 · 9 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 33% (winner's lowest chance)
MIN 100%5050%50LAK 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +28 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Los Angeles Kings win this game 69% of the time.

LAK winsMIN wins

Simulated goal difference (LAK − MIN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).