Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Apr 7, 2018·Bridgestone Arena, Nashville

Columbus Blue Jackets 2, Nashville Predators 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 72% of the time.

NSH winsCBJ wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CBJ01311018231
NSH31501012427

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 7:52NSHAustin WatsonAssists: Mike Fisher · Wrist, 0.06 xG0–1
  2. P1 11:04NSHFilip ForsbergPPAssists: Scott Hartnell, Ryan Johansen · Snap, 0.16 xG0–2
  3. P1 19:59NSHFilip ForsbergPPGWGAssists: Craig Smith, Kyle Turris · Wrist, 0.08 xG0–3
  4. P2 7:55CBJJosh AndersonAssists: Mark Letestu · Wrist, 0.07 xG1–3
  5. P3 7:20CBJBrandon DubinskySHAssists: Markus Hannikainen, Scott Harrington · Wrist, 0.19 xG2–3
  6. P3 19:20NSHFilip ForsbergENUnassisted · Wrist, 0.53 xG2–4
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 10:12CBJIan Cole: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  2. P1 12:41NSHAlexei Emelin: Roughing2 min
  3. P1 15:15CBJDavid Savard: Hooking2 min
  4. P1 18:16CBJIan Cole: Holding2 min · PPG
  5. P1 19:59CBJOliver Bjorkstrand: Bench2 min
  6. P3 6:37CBJIan Cole: Interference2 min
  7. P3 17:10CBJJosh Anderson: Roughing2 min
  8. P3 17:10NSHAlexei Emelin: Roughing2 min
  9. P3 19:20NSHAustin Watson: Misconduct10 min
  10. P3 19:20CBJPierre-Luc Dubois: Misconduct10 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CBJ00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0NSH
46% to win54% to win
← CBJ attackNSH attack →
  1. P1 20:00Johansen won the faceoff against Letestu
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CBJNSH
31Shots on goal27
2.3Expected goals3.5
51Shot attempts56
19Faceoffs won36
1Power plays5
22Penalty minutes14
19Hits14
15Blocked shots10
14Giveaways11
9Takeaways10

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Columbus Blue Jackets

Forward lines

  1. bestVanek – Broadhurst – Jenner10:06

    xG 0.81–0.42 (66%)attempts 10–9goals 0–0

  2. Letestu – Anderson – Robinson5:28

    xG 0.12–0.21 (37%)attempts 5–3goals 1–0

  3. Anderson – Milano – Dubois3:33

    xG 0.08–0.17 (31%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

  4. Letestu – Bjorkstrand – Robinson3:30

    xG 0.15–0.27 (36%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestJohnson – Chorney13:02

    xG 0.90–0.60 (60%)attempts 15–11goals 1–0

  2. Johnson – Harrington2:03

    xG 0.06–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 0–0

  3. Harrington – Kukan10:59

    xG 0.40–0.53 (43%)attempts 9–13goals 0–0

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestHartnell – Johansen – Forsberg9:11

    xG 0.64–0.13 (83%)attempts 13–6goals 0–0

  2. Fisher – Watson – Salomaki9:51

    xG 0.43–0.24 (64%)attempts 9–8goals 1–0

  3. Turris – Smith – Fiala10:27

    xG 0.69–0.58 (54%)attempts 12–7goals 0–0

  4. Bonino – Sissons – Hartman10:00

    xG 0.45–0.35 (56%)attempts 5–11goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestEkholm – Irwin13:51

    xG 0.72–0.46 (61%)attempts 14–8goals 0–1

  2. Emelin – Subban12:05

    xG 0.79–0.56 (59%)attempts 12–14goals 0–0

  3. Josi – Ellis12:36

    xG 0.48–0.55 (46%)attempts 14–13goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

NSH 3.5 xGCBJ 2.3 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

NSHCBJ

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

NSH's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NSH is favoured, below it CBJ. Dots are goals.

Excitement 63/100 · #488 of 1271 this seasonSwing 0.86 · 6 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 54% (winner's lowest chance)
CBJ 100%5050%50NSH 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 72% of the time.

NSH winsCBJ wins

Simulated goal difference (NSH − CBJ), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).