Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Oct 3, 2018·Rogers Arena, Vancouver

Calgary Flames 2, Vancouver Canucks 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 51% of the time.

VAN winsCGY wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CGY0909217235
VAN1100548523

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 13:48VANElias PetterssonAssists: Loui Eriksson, Nikolay Goldobin · Wrist, 0.09 xG0–1
  2. P3 1:52VANNikolay GoldobinAssists: Elias Pettersson, Loui Eriksson · Wrist, 0.10 xG0–2
  3. P3 2:20VANBrendan LeipsicGWGAssists: Jay Beagle, Erik Gudbranson · Wrist, 0.22 xG0–3
  4. P3 3:08CGYMatthew TkachukAssists: Austin Czarnik, Noah Hanifin · Wrist, 0.01 xG1–3
  5. P3 5:46VANJake VirtanenAssists: Brandon Sutter, Chris Tanev · Wrist, 0.21 xG1–4
  6. P3 8:08CGYSean MonahanAssists: Johnny Gaudreau, James Neal · Wrist, 0.17 xG2–4
  7. P3 19:12VANTyler MotteENAssists: Markus Granlund · Wrist, 0.64 xG2–5
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 1:50VANErik Gudbranson: Interference2 min
  2. P1 4:22VANErik Gudbranson: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 4:22CGYTravis Hamonic: Fighting5 min
  4. P1 11:23VANErik Gudbranson: Hooking2 min
  5. P2 4:41CGYMatthew Tkachuk: Slashing2 min
  6. P2 12:21VANBrandon Sutter: Hooking2 min
  7. P2 15:25VANBrock Boeser: Slashing2 min
  8. P3 3:33VANJake Virtanen: Tripping2 min
  9. P3 8:48VANDerrick Pouliot: Tripping2 min
  10. P3 14:22VANBrendan Leipsic: Delaying game puck over glass2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CGY00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0VAN
46% to win54% to win
← CGY attackVAN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Backlund won the faceoff against Horvat
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CGYVAN
35Shots on goal23
3.9Expected goals3.8
73Shot attempts34
34Faceoffs won25
7Power plays1
7Penalty minutes19
17Hits16
6Blocked shots18
6Giveaways9
1Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Calgary Flames

Forward lines

  1. bestNeal – Gaudreau – Monahan4:07

    xG 0.67–0.08 (89%)attempts 7–2goals 1–0

  2. Backlund – Czarnik – Tkachuk4:15

    xG 0.66–0.30 (69%)attempts 12–2goals 1–0

  3. Frolik – Jankowski – Bennett4:40

    xG 0.37–0.09 (80%)attempts 7–3goals 0–1

  4. Frolik – Backlund – Tkachuk6:41

    xG 0.42–0.16 (73%)attempts 6–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestHamonic – Hanifin11:24

    xG 0.92–0.16 (85%)attempts 17–6goals 1–1

  2. Giordano – Hanifin2:11

    xG 0.42–0.06 (87%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0

  3. Giordano – Brodie11:42

    xG 1.21–0.89 (58%)attempts 22–10goals 1–0

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestBeagle – Granlund – Leipsic6:22

    xG 0.69–0.03 (96%)attempts 7–3goals 1–0

  2. Eriksson – Goldobin – Pettersson5:25

    xG 0.28–0.39 (41%)attempts 7–4goals 2–0

  3. Sutter – Motte – Virtanen11:07

    xG 0.40–0.94 (30%)attempts 5–17goals 1–0

  4. Baertschi – Horvat – Boeser10:18

    xG 0.52–1.31 (29%)attempts 6–17goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestGudbranson – Pouliot10:16

    xG 0.87–0.28 (76%)attempts 13–6goals 3–0

  2. Edler – Tanev11:37

    xG 0.25–1.03 (19%)attempts 5–17goals 0–1

  3. Del Zotto – Stecher15:13

    xG 0.24–1.61 (13%)attempts 4–27goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

VAN 3.8 xGCGY 3.9 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

VANCGY

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

VAN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line VAN is favoured, below it CGY. Dots are goals.

Excitement 51/100 · #628 of 1271 this seasonSwing 0.80 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 53% (winner's lowest chance)
CGY 100%5050%50VAN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +16 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 51% of the time.

VAN winsCGY wins

Simulated goal difference (VAN − CGY), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).