Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Oct 6, 2018·Scotiabank Saddledome, Calgary

Vancouver Canucks 4, Calgary Flames 7

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 94% of the time.

CGY winsVAN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
VAN252708420
CGY29117411737

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:12CGYElias LindholmAssists: TJ Brodie, Mark Giordano · Tip-in, 0.09 xG0–1
  2. P1 13:15VANElias PetterssonAssists: Nikolay Goldobin, Loui Eriksson · Wrist, 0.10 xG1–1
  3. P1 16:38VANBrandon SutterSHUnassisted · Snap, 0.07 xG2–1
  4. P1 17:08CGYMark GiordanoAssists: TJ Brodie, Elias Lindholm · Wrist, 0.03 xG2–2
  5. P2 2:52VANElias PetterssonPPAssists: Alexander Edler, Bo Horvat · Slap, 0.15 xG3–2
  6. P2 9:31CGYJohnny GaudreauPPAssists: Sean Monahan, Matthew Tkachuk · Wrist, 0.32 xG3–3
  7. P2 16:58VANBo HorvatPPAssists: Elias Pettersson, Alexander Edler · Tip-in, 0.24 xG4–3
  8. P3 9:27CGYSean MonahanPPAssists: Johnny Gaudreau, Matthew Tkachuk · Snap, 0.25 xG4–4
  9. P3 14:28CGYElias LindholmPPGWGAssists: Johnny Gaudreau, Matthew Tkachuk · Wrist, 0.06 xG4–5
  10. P3 18:22CGYAustin CzarnikENAssists: Mark Giordano, Matthew Tkachuk · Snap, 0.75 xG4–6
  11. P3 19:24CGYMichael FrolikENUnassisted · Wrist, 0.73 xG4–7
Penalties (12)
  1. P1 15:05VANNikolay Goldobin: High sticking2 min
  2. P2 2:10CGYDalton Prout: Interference2 min · PPG
  3. P2 7:39VANJake Virtanen: Interference2 min · PPG
  4. P2 15:20CGYMark Giordano: Tripping2 min · PPG
  5. P2 16:37CGYMichael Stone: Tripping2 min
  6. P2 18:44VANElias Pettersson: Tripping2 min
  7. P2 19:36CGYMatthew Tkachuk: Roughing2 min
  8. P3 4:12VANSven Baertschi: Holding2 min
  9. P3 6:50CGYMichael Frolik: Tripping2 min
  10. P3 8:11VANBrock Boeser: Slashing2 min · PPG
  11. P3 13:45VANNikolay Goldobin: Slashing2 min · PPG
  12. P3 19:04CGYNoah Hanifin: Cross checking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

VAN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CGY
46% to win54% to win
← VAN attackCGY attack →
  1. P1 20:00Lindholm won the faceoff against Sutter
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

VANCGY
20Shots on goal37
2.1Expected goals5.7
45Shot attempts73
30Faceoffs won36
6Power plays6
12Penalty minutes12
16Hits18
23Blocked shots13
9Giveaways15
10Takeaways11

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestEriksson – Goldobin – Pettersson6:16

    xG 0.82–0.09 (90%)attempts 10–4goals 1–0

  2. Baertschi – Horvat – Boeser10:58

    xG 0.25–0.33 (43%)attempts 10–12goals 0–0

  3. Beagle – Granlund – Leipsic5:27

    xG 0.01–0.11 (11%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

  4. Sutter – Motte – Virtanen7:01

    xG 0.00–0.77 (0%)attempts 4–14goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestDel Zotto – Tanev2:59

    xG 0.25–0.00 (100%)attempts 8–0goals 1–0

  2. Gudbranson – Pouliot7:31

    xG 0.31–0.12 (73%)attempts 9–9goals 0–0

  3. Del Zotto – Gudbranson4:34

    xG 0.31–0.40 (44%)attempts 3–8goals 0–0

Calgary Flames

Forward lines

  1. bestBacklund – Czarnik – Tkachuk8:31

    xG 0.83–0.08 (91%)attempts 18–5goals 0–0

  2. Gaudreau – Lindholm – Monahan12:31

    xG 0.62–0.40 (61%)attempts 14–12goals 2–1

  3. Frolik – Jankowski – Bennett3:50

    xG 0.02–0.03 (34%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

  4. Neal – Ryan – Dube9:51

    xG 0.22–0.74 (23%)attempts 7–12goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestProut – Välimäki8:40

    xG 0.90–0.18 (83%)attempts 18–4goals 0–0

  2. Stone – Hanifin13:21

    xG 0.66–0.45 (60%)attempts 13–9goals 0–0

  3. Giordano – Brodie14:55

    xG 0.27–0.27 (49%)attempts 14–10goals 2–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CGY 5.7 xGVAN 2.1 xG
0123456P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CGYVAN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CGY's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CGY is favoured, below it VAN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 97/100 · #47 of 1271 this seasonSwing 2.49 · 11 goals in reachComeback index 18% (winner's lowest chance)
VAN 100%5050%50CGY 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +35 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 94% of the time.

CGY winsVAN wins

Simulated goal difference (CGY − VAN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).