Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Oct 9, 2018·Nationwide Arena, Columbus

Colorado Avalanche 2, Columbus Blue Jackets 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Columbus Blue Jackets win this game 91% of the time.

CBJ winsCOL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
COL092909227
CBJ21708310535

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 6:49CBJNick FolignoAssists: Alexander Wennberg, Anthony Duclair · Snap, 0.13 xG0–1
  2. P1 10:32CBJPierre-Luc DuboisPPAssists: Cam Atkinson, Nick Foligno · Snap, 0.67 xG0–2
  3. P2 3:27COLNathan MacKinnonAssists: Mikko Rantanen, Erik Johnson · Snap, 0.07 xG1–2
  4. P2 9:30COLCarl SoderbergPPAssists: Samuel Girard, Alexander Kerfoot · Tip-in, 0.03 xG2–2
  5. P3 5:14CBJArtemi PanarinGWGAssists: Markus Nutivaara, Ryan Murray · Snap, 0.08 xG2–3
  6. P3 11:32CBJNick FolignoAssists: Alexander Wennberg · Snap, 0.07 xG2–4
  7. P3 18:00CBJJosh AndersonENUnassisted · Wrist, 0.50 xG2–5
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 0:49CBJAlexander Wennberg: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 9:07COLSheldon Dries: Tripping2 min · PPG
  3. P1 9:55COLJ.T. Compher: Hooking2 min
  4. P1 14:00COLAlexander Kerfoot: High sticking2 min
  5. P2 4:45CBJPierre-Luc Dubois: Holding2 min
  6. P2 9:12CBJNick Foligno: Slashing2 min · PPG
  7. P2 11:55COLAlexander Kerfoot: Hooking2 min
  8. P3 1:56CBJBoone Jenner: Slashing2 min
  9. P3 15:26COLGabriel Landeskog: Tripping2 min
  10. P3 18:31COLSheldon Dries: Delaying game puck over glass2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

COL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CBJ
46% to win54% to win
← COL attackCBJ attack →
  1. P1 20:00Dubois won the faceoff against MacKinnon
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

COLCBJ
27Shots on goal35
2.1Expected goals5.3
45Shot attempts54
31Faceoffs won35
4Power plays6
12Penalty minutes8
7Hits10
9Blocked shots11
6Giveaways5
3Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. Wilson – Kerfoot – Jost7:23

    xG 0.23–0.20 (53%)attempts 8–2goals 0–0

  2. Calvert – Compher – Dries3:17

    xG 0.00–0.09 (0%)attempts 0–2goals 0–0

  3. Soderberg – Bourque – Nieto3:27

    xG 0.02–0.18 (10%)attempts 1–5goals 0–0

  4. Landeskog – MacKinnon – Rantanen12:19

    xG 0.32–1.27 (20%)attempts 10–13goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestJohnson – Girard12:13

    xG 0.47–0.33 (59%)attempts 15–7goals 0–0

  2. Barberio – Barrie2:38

    xG 0.04–0.11 (25%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

  3. Cole – Barrie8:50

    xG 0.30–0.39 (43%)attempts 7–7goals 0–0

Columbus Blue Jackets

Forward lines

  1. bestDuclair – Wennberg – Panarin2:07

    xG 0.60–0.15 (80%)attempts 6–4goals 1–0

  2. Atkinson – Panarin – Dubois8:49

    xG 0.55–0.13 (81%)attempts 9–5goals 0–0

  3. Sedlak – Bjorkstrand – Milano4:37

    xG 0.30–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 0–0

  4. Foligno – Duclair – Wennberg6:14

    xG 0.40–0.13 (76%)attempts 8–5goals 2–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMurray – Nutivaara13:49

    xG 1.18–0.32 (79%)attempts 17–9goals 2–1

  2. Savard – Nutivaara2:50

    xG 0.27–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

  3. Clendening – Harrington7:40

    xG 0.26–0.09 (74%)attempts 5–4goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CBJ 5.3 xGCOL 2.1 xG
0123456P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CBJCOL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CBJ's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CBJ is favoured, below it COL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 71/100 · #377 of 1271 this seasonSwing 1.43 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 47% (winner's lowest chance)
COL 100%5050%50CBJ 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +31 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Columbus Blue Jackets win this game 91% of the time.

CBJ winsCOL wins

Simulated goal difference (CBJ − COL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).