Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Oct 13, 2018·Centre Bell, Montreal

Pittsburgh Penguins 3, Montréal Canadiens 4 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Montréal Canadiens win this game 72% of the time.

MTL winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
PIT2714014030328
MTL08319011022440

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 3:13PITDominik SimonAssists: Daniel Sprong, Kris Letang · Backhand, 0.09 xG1–0
  2. P1 15:16PITKris LetangAssists: Phil Kessel, Evgeni Malkin · Wrist, 0.05 xG2–0
  3. P2 0:11MTLTomas TatarAssists: Brendan Gallagher, Phillip Danault · Wrist, 0.11 xG2–1
  4. P2 7:38MTLBrendan GallagherAssists: Jeff Petry, Tomas Tatar · Backhand, 0.15 xG2–2
  5. P2 8:51MTLTomas TatarPPAssists: Jonathan Drouin, Jeff Petry · Wrist, 0.11 xG2–3
  6. P2 11:14PITPhil KesselPPAssists: Sidney Crosby, Evgeni Malkin · Wrist, 0.15 xG3–3

Shootout

  1. 1. MTL Paul Byron scored
  2. 2. PIT Evgeni Malkin stopped
  3. 3. MTL Jonathan Drouin scored
  4. 4. PIT Sidney Crosby stopped
Penalties (8)
  1. P2 1:10PITBrian Dumoulin: Hooking2 min
  2. P2 8:29PITEvgeni Malkin: Hooking2 min · PPG
  3. P2 10:19MTLJordie Benn: Slashing2 min · PPG
  4. P2 17:28PITDominik Simon: Tripping2 min
  5. P2 17:40PITCarl Hagelin: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  6. P2 0:00MTLJesperi Kotkaniemi: Too many men on the ice2 min
  7. P3 11:01PITEvgeni Malkin: Holding2 min
  8. OT 0:47PITJake Guentzel: Too many men on the ice2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MTL
46% to win54% to win
← PIT attackMTL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Danault won the faceoff against Crosby
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITMTL
28Shots on goal40
2.0Expected goals3.4
48Shot attempts78
36Faceoffs won39
2Power plays6
12Penalty minutes4
32Hits26
25Blocked shots10
10Giveaways15
14Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestMalkin – Kessel – Hagelin11:23

    xG 0.37–0.13 (75%)attempts 11–9goals 1–0

  2. Crosby – Brassard – Guentzel15:13

    xG 0.58–0.53 (52%)attempts 16–18goals 0–1

  3. Hornqvist – Sheahan – Rust8:28

    xG 0.21–0.23 (47%)attempts 5–6goals 0–0

  4. Cullen – Sprong – Simon4:40

    xG 0.02–0.22 (10%)attempts 2–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestJohnson – Schultz2:12

    xG 0.25–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 1–0

  2. Johnson – Riikola4:32

    xG 0.38–0.22 (63%)attempts 8–5goals 0–1

  3. Letang – Dumoulin17:26

    xG 0.49–0.50 (49%)attempts 17–15goals 0–1

Montréal Canadiens

Forward lines

  1. bestTatar – Gallagher – Danault13:24

    xG 0.60–0.25 (71%)attempts 18–11goals 2–0

  2. Byron – Armia – Kotkaniemi6:46

    xG 0.30–0.15 (67%)attempts 9–4goals 0–0

  3. Plekanec – Shaw – Hudon3:11

    xG 0.22–0.12 (65%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0

  4. Shaw – Hudon – Kotkaniemi2:21

    xG 0.07–0.01 (89%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBenn – Ouellet13:55

    xG 0.70–0.26 (73%)attempts 23–9goals 0–0

  2. Petry – Mete11:40

    xG 0.39–0.26 (60%)attempts 8–7goals 1–1

  3. Reilly – Juulsen16:24

    xG 0.43–0.58 (43%)attempts 16–16goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MTL 3.4 xGPIT 2.0 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MTLPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MTL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MTL is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 81/100 · #259 of 1271 this seasonSwing 2.03 · 6 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 17% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50MTL 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +23 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Montréal Canadiens win this game 72% of the time.

MTL winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (MTL − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).