Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Oct 16, 2018·Madison Square Garden, New York

Colorado Avalanche 2, New York Rangers 3 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, New York Rangers win this game 65% of the time.

NYR winsCOL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
COL07215010011233
NYR11911208042343

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 12:07NYRChris KreiderPPAssists: Kevin Shattenkirk, Mats Zuccarello · Tip-in, 0.17 xG0–1
  2. P2 8:13COLGabriel LandeskogPPAssists: Tyson Jost, Tyson Barrie · Tip-in, 0.19 xG1–1
  3. P2 10:53NYRKevin HayesAssists: Mats Zuccarello, Kevin Shattenkirk · Slap, 0.03 xG1–2
  4. P2 19:47COLNathan MacKinnonAssists: Gabriel Landeskog, Mikko Rantanen · Tip-in, 0.13 xG2–2

Shootout

  1. 1. NYR Mats Zuccarello scored
  2. 2. COL Nathan MacKinnon stopped
  3. 3. NYR Mika Zibanejad stopped
  4. 4. COL Mikko Rantanen scored
  5. 5. NYR Kevin Shattenkirk scored
  6. 6. COL Gabriel Landeskog stopped
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 10:23COLPatrik Nemeth: Hooking2 min · PPG
  2. P1 13:06NYRJesper Fast: Hooking2 min
  3. P1 19:40COLMatt Calvert: Tripping2 min
  4. P2 7:30NYRKevin Hayes: Tripping2 min · PPG
  5. P2 8:50NYRFredrik Claesson: Fighting5 min
  6. P2 8:50COLMatt Calvert: Fighting5 min
  7. P2 12:45COLGabriel Landeskog: High sticking double minor4 min
  8. P3 4:31NYRFilip Chytil: Hooking2 min
  9. P3 5:26COLMikko Rantanen: Holding2 min
  10. OT 0:20COLNathan MacKinnon: Holding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

COL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0NYR
46% to win54% to win
← COL attackNYR attack →
  1. P1 20:00Zibanejad won the faceoff against MacKinnon
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

COLNYR
33Shots on goal43
3.5Expected goals4.6
64Shot attempts76
23Faceoffs won39
3Power plays6
17Penalty minutes11
23Hits31
23Blocked shots17
11Giveaways17
4Takeaways14

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestSoderberg – Calvert – Nieto8:50

    xG 0.53–0.40 (57%)attempts 10–9goals 0–0

  2. Wilson – Kerfoot – Jost11:31

    xG 0.69–0.66 (51%)attempts 12–14goals 0–1

  3. Landeskog – MacKinnon – Rantanen14:19

    xG 0.66–0.66 (50%)attempts 16–16goals 1–0

  4. Bourque – Kamenev – Dries4:24

    xG 0.28–0.39 (41%)attempts 7–9goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBarrie – Zadorov3:05

    xG 0.15–0.09 (63%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

  2. Nemeth – Zadorov8:54

    xG 0.23–0.28 (45%)attempts 5–8goals 0–0

  3. Cole – Barrie14:13

    xG 0.75–1.04 (42%)attempts 16–20goals 0–0

New York Rangers

Forward lines

  1. bestZuccarello – Hayes – Chytil11:17

    xG 0.84–0.24 (78%)attempts 16–8goals 1–0

  2. Namestnikov – Vesey – Howden8:11

    xG 0.62–0.48 (56%)attempts 9–9goals 0–1

  3. McLeod – Spooner – Lettieri4:29

    xG 0.04–0.24 (13%)attempts 6–6goals 0–0

  4. Kreider – Fast – Zibanejad11:53

    xG 0.62–0.95 (40%)attempts 13–18goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestShattenkirk – Claesson9:07

    xG 0.62–0.31 (67%)attempts 8–5goals 0–0

  2. Shattenkirk – Skjei2:17

    xG 0.13–0.01 (94%)attempts 3–2goals 1–0

  3. Skjei – Pionk16:21

    xG 0.43–0.67 (39%)attempts 19–20goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

NYR 4.6 xGCOL 3.5 xG
012345P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

NYRCOL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

NYR's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NYR is favoured, below it COL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 58/100 · #525 of 1271 this seasonSwing 1.74 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 47% (winner's lowest chance)
COL 100%5050%50NYR 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +27 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, New York Rangers win this game 65% of the time.

NYR winsCOL wins

Simulated goal difference (NYR − COL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).