Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Oct 16, 2018·Wells Fargo Center, Philadelphia

Florida Panthers 5, Philadelphia Flyers 6 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 66% of the time.

PHI winsFLA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
FLA1122826001526
PHI0551107032626

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 17:58FLAFrank VatranoAssists: Denis Malgin, Jared McCann · Snap, 0.02 xG1–0
  2. P2 1:18PHIWayne SimmondsAssists: Travis Sanheim, Radko Gudas · Tip-in, 0.06 xG1–1
  3. P2 5:54PHIJordan WealAssists: Robert Hagg, Travis Konecny · Slap, 0.22 xG1–2
  4. P2 8:50PHIClaude GirouxUnassisted · Wrist, 0.10 xG1–3
  5. P2 12:31FLAFrank VatranoAssists: Jared McCann, Mark Pysyk · Snap, 0.16 xG2–3
  6. P2 15:29PHIWayne SimmondsAssists: Scott Laughton, Christian Folin · Backhand, 0.13 xG2–4
  7. P2 17:03PHIClaude GirouxAssists: Jordan Weal, Shayne Gostisbehere · Wrist, 0.11 xG2–5
  8. P2 17:31FLAMike HoffmanPPAssists: Keith Yandle, Vincent Trocheck · Deflected, 0.17 xG3–5
  9. P3 5:06FLAEvgenii DadonovAssists: Bogdan Kiselevich, Troy Brouwer · Wrist, 0.14 xG4–5
  10. P3 8:07FLAAleksander BarkovAssists: Keith Yandle · Backhand, 0.12 xG5–5

Shootout

  1. 1. PHI Jakub Voracek scored
  2. 2. FLA Vincent Trocheck stopped
  3. 3. PHI Claude Giroux stopped
  4. 4. FLA Aleksander Barkov scored
  5. 5. PHI Jordan Weal scored
  6. 6. FLA Frank Vatrano stopped
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 12:20PHITravis Konecny: Interference2 min
  2. P1 15:40FLAAaron Ekblad: Holding2 min
  3. P2 6:27PHIWayne Simmonds: High sticking2 min
  4. P2 17:23FLAAlexander Petrovic: Roughing2 min
  5. P2 17:23PHIRobert Hagg: Roughing2 min · PPG
  6. P2 17:23PHIWayne Simmonds: Roughing2 min
  7. P2 17:23PHIWayne Simmonds: Misconduct10 min
  8. P2 17:23FLAAlexander Petrovic: Misconduct10 min
  9. OT 1:55FLAMike Hoffman: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

FLA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PHI
46% to win54% to win
← FLA attackPHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Giroux won the faceoff against Barkov
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

FLAPHI
26Shots on goal26
1.9Expected goals2.8
53Shot attempts50
35Faceoffs won30
3Power plays2
16Penalty minutes18
29Hits23
14Blocked shots13
16Giveaways11
7Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Florida Panthers

Forward lines

  1. bestDadonov – Bjugstad – Barkov15:47

    xG 0.58–0.36 (61%)attempts 15–11goals 1–0

  2. McCann – Vatrano – Malgin10:27

    xG 0.19–0.09 (68%)attempts 8–2goals 1–1

  3. Brouwer – Lammikko – Mamin6:38

    xG 0.06–0.02 (75%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0

  4. Hoffman – Trocheck – Huberdeau12:41

    xG 0.38–0.98 (28%)attempts 14–12goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestWeegar – Kiselevich12:58

    xG 0.46–0.08 (85%)attempts 12–5goals 2–1

  2. Yandle – Ekblad19:08

    xG 0.58–0.39 (60%)attempts 16–15goals 1–0

  3. Pysyk – Kiselevich2:13

    xG 0.00–0.20 (0%)attempts 0–2goals 0–0

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestWeal – Lindblom – Konecny13:40

    xG 0.63–0.03 (96%)attempts 15–6goals 1–0

  2. Giroux – Voracek – Couturier16:41

    xG 0.80–0.57 (58%)attempts 16–17goals 1–1

  3. Simmonds – Laughton – Raffl4:30

    xG 0.19–0.18 (51%)attempts 2–4goals 2–1

  4. Weise – Laughton – Raffl3:32

    xG 0.00–0.02 (0%)attempts 0–1goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestHagg – Folin14:36

    xG 0.61–0.02 (96%)attempts 13–6goals 2–0

  2. Gudas – Sanheim12:04

    xG 0.23–0.28 (45%)attempts 6–9goals 1–1

  3. Gudas – Hagg2:28

    xG 0.00–0.34 (0%)attempts 0–9goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PHI 2.8 xGFLA 1.9 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PHIFLA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PHI is favoured, below it FLA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 99/100 · #21 of 1271 this seasonSwing 2.37 · 10 goals in reach · 3-goal lead cutComeback index 32% (winner's lowest chance)
FLA 100%5050%50PHI 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +33 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 66% of the time.

PHI winsFLA wins

Simulated goal difference (PHI − FLA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).