Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Oct 25, 2018·Scotiabank Saddledome, Calgary

Pittsburgh Penguins 9, Calgary Flames 1

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 54% of the time.

CGY winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PIT31441329936
CGY010015114139

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:23PITSidney CrosbyAssists: Kris Letang, Derick Brassard · Backhand, 0.06 xG1–0
  2. P1 14:19PITPatric HornqvistPPGWGAssists: Sidney Crosby, Evgeni Malkin · Tip-in, 0.02 xG2–0
  3. P1 19:08PITBryan RustAssists: Dominik Simon, Jamie Oleksiak · Wrist, 0.17 xG3–0
  4. P2 1:17PITPhil KesselAssists: Evgeni Malkin, Derick Brassard · Wrist, 0.26 xG4–0
  5. P2 6:28PITPatric HornqvistAssists: Riley Sheahan, Brian Dumoulin · Wrist, 0.03 xG5–0
  6. P2 9:19PITPhil KesselAssists: Kris Letang, Bryan Rust · Wrist, 0.09 xG6–0
  7. P2 19:39PITJack JohnsonPPAssists: Derick Brassard, Olli Maatta · Wrist, 0.06 xG7–0
  8. P3 13:55PITJake GuentzelAssists: Sidney Crosby · Tip-in, 0.09 xG8–0
  9. P3 18:00CGYJames NealAssists: Sean Monahan, Dillon Dube · Wrist, 0.09 xG8–1
  10. P3 18:34PITMatt CullenAssists: Dominik Simon · Slap, 0.08 xG9–1
Penalties (5)
  1. P1 0:53PITKris Letang: Slashing2 min
  2. P1 13:07CGYMark Jankowski: Hooking2 min · PPG
  3. P2 7:10PITPhil Kessel: Slashing2 min
  4. P2 13:47PITEvgeni Malkin: Holding2 min
  5. P2 17:40CGYMichael Stone: Tripping2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CGY
46% to win54% to win
← PIT attackCGY attack →
  1. P1 20:00Crosby won the faceoff against Lindholm
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITCGY
36Shots on goal39
2.9Expected goals3.2
57Shot attempts83
29Faceoffs won38
2Power plays3
6Penalty minutes4
11Hits16
23Blocked shots13
11Giveaways9
9Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestGrant – Rust – Simon9:28

    xG 0.59–0.21 (74%)attempts 9–5goals 1–0

  2. Malkin – Kessel – Hagelin11:24

    xG 0.58–0.43 (57%)attempts 11–15goals 1–0

  3. Crosby – Brassard – Guentzel9:30

    xG 0.54–0.52 (51%)attempts 7–17goals 1–0

  4. Cullen – Hornqvist – Sheahan9:01

    xG 0.30–0.35 (46%)attempts 9–11goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestOleksiak – Maatta15:36

    xG 0.77–0.39 (67%)attempts 12–16goals 1–0

  2. Letang – Dumoulin16:35

    xG 0.92–1.06 (46%)attempts 18–27goals 5–0

  3. Johnson – Ruhwedel13:00

    xG 0.22–0.62 (26%)attempts 7–20goals 0–1

Calgary Flames

Forward lines

  1. bestGaudreau – Lindholm – Bennett7:30

    xG 0.63–0.31 (67%)attempts 11–5goals 0–0

  2. Neal – Monahan – Tkachuk5:45

    xG 0.15–0.10 (60%)attempts 7–4goals 0–0

  3. Hathaway – Czarnik – Dube2:28

    xG 0.15–0.10 (59%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

  4. Frolik – Jankowski – Czarnik4:42

    xG 0.17–0.16 (52%)attempts 7–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestHamonic – Hanifin15:47

    xG 1.08–0.59 (65%)attempts 29–14goals 1–2

  2. Giordano – Andersson15:53

    xG 0.52–0.75 (41%)attempts 17–12goals 0–2

  3. Stone – Brodie15:28

    xG 0.52–0.96 (35%)attempts 16–17goals 0–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CGY 3.2 xGPIT 2.9 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CGYPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CGY's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CGY is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 13/100 · #1075 of 1271 this seasonSwing 0.58 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 45% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50CGY 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +18 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 54% of the time.

CGY winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (CGY − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).