Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Oct 25, 2018·Rogers Place, Edmonton

Washington Capitals 1, Edmonton Oilers 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 59% of the time.

EDM winsWSH wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
WSH0919014132
EDM1911429432

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 16:28EDMEvan BouchardPPAssists: Kailer Yamamoto, Tobias Rieder · Snap, 0.05 xG0–1
  2. P2 10:06EDMRyan Nugent-HopkinsSHGWGUnassisted · Wrist, 0.11 xG0–2
  3. P2 12:21WSHAndre BurakovskyAssists: Nic Dowd, John Carlson · Wrist, 0.04 xG1–2
  4. P3 9:16EDMAlex ChiassonAssists: Tobias Rieder, Adam Larsson · Wrist, 0.03 xG1–3
  5. P3 18:43EDMConnor McDavidENAssists: Ryan Nugent-Hopkins, Cam Talbot · Wrist, 0.75 xG1–4
Penalties (5)
  1. P1 14:31WSHMichal Kempny: Tripping2 min · PPG
  2. P2 9:19EDMMilan Lucic: Cross checking2 min
  3. P2 14:59WSHMichal Kempny: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  4. P3 4:35WSHDmitrij Jaskin: Delaying game bench face off violation2 min
  5. P3 11:26WSHBrett Connolly: Delaying game bench2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

WSH00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0EDM
46% to win54% to win
← WSH attackEDM attack →
  1. P1 20:00Kuznetsov won the faceoff against McDavid
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

WSHEDM
32Shots on goal32
2.4Expected goals2.9
68Shot attempts54
34Faceoffs won26
1Power plays4
8Penalty minutes2
28Hits16
12Blocked shots25
14Giveaways15
7Takeaways10

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Washington Capitals

Forward lines

  1. bestDowd – Jaskin – Burakovsky5:01

    xG 0.43–0.00 (100%)attempts 13–0goals 1–0

  2. Eller – Connolly – Vrana9:34

    xG 0.50–0.28 (65%)attempts 14–12goals 0–0

  3. Eller – Connolly – Stephenson2:40

    xG 0.19–0.05 (78%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

  4. Oshie – Backstrom – Stephenson9:16

    xG 0.13–0.08 (64%)attempts 9–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestCarlson – Kempny12:51

    xG 0.54–0.39 (58%)attempts 17–17goals 0–0

  2. Orpik – Djoos11:41

    xG 0.34–0.29 (55%)attempts 10–10goals 1–0

  3. Niskanen – Orlov16:22

    xG 0.57–0.66 (46%)attempts 15–13goals 0–1

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. bestNugent-Hopkins – McDavid – Yamamoto11:07

    xG 0.78–0.33 (71%)attempts 13–13goals 0–0

  2. Brodziak – Khaira – Marody6:54

    xG 0.33–0.35 (48%)attempts 11–9goals 0–0

  3. Lucic – Strome – Caggiula10:05

    xG 0.21–0.24 (47%)attempts 10–9goals 0–0

  4. Chiasson – Rieder – Draisaitl12:24

    xG 0.26–0.55 (32%)attempts 8–16goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestLarsson – Klefbom17:14

    xG 1.14–0.71 (62%)attempts 23–20goals 1–0

  2. Russell – Gravel2:13

    xG 0.04–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

  3. Gravel – Larsson2:37

    xG 0.06–0.04 (64%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

EDM 2.9 xGWSH 2.4 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

EDMWSH

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

EDM's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line EDM is favoured, below it WSH. Dots are goals.

Excitement 26/100 · #912 of 1271 this seasonSwing 0.87 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 52% (winner's lowest chance)
WSH 100%5050%50EDM 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +18 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 59% of the time.

EDM winsWSH wins

Simulated goal difference (EDM − WSH), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).