Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Oct 27, 2018·Nationwide Arena, Columbus

Buffalo Sabres 4, Columbus Blue Jackets 5 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 64% of the time.

CBJ winsBUF wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
BUF2170821300438
CBJ1123160811537

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:38BUFKyle OkposoAssists: Tage Thompson, Casey Nelson · Tip-in, 0.14 xG1–0
  2. P1 8:37CBJPierre-Luc DuboisAssists: Artemi Panarin · Snap, 0.06 xG1–1
  3. P1 14:11BUFJeff SkinnerAssists: Jake McCabe, Jack Eichel · Snap, 0.36 xG2–1
  4. P2 1:34CBJArtemi PanarinAssists: Pierre-Luc Dubois, Cam Atkinson · Wrist, 0.05 xG2–2
  5. P2 16:42CBJCam AtkinsonAssists: Riley Nash, Zach Werenski · Wrist, 0.16 xG2–3
  6. P2 17:13CBJCam AtkinsonAssists: Nick Foligno, Scott Harrington · Wrist, 0.03 xG2–4
  7. P3 2:32BUFJason PominvilleAssists: Jack Eichel, Jake McCabe · Snap, 0.11 xG3–4
  8. P3 4:30BUFCasey MittelstadtPPAssists: Jason Pominville, Jeff Skinner · Snap, 0.44 xG4–4
  9. OT 0:31CBJArtemi PanarinGWGAssists: Pierre-Luc Dubois · Wrist, 0.10 xG4–5
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 5:00BUFRasmus Dahlin: Holding2 min
  2. P1 14:11CBJArtemi Panarin: Delaying game bench2 min
  3. P2 6:50BUFRasmus Ristolainen: Slashing2 min
  4. P2 12:11CBJLukas Sedlak: High sticking2 min
  5. P3 3:55CBJDavid Savard: Slashing2 min · PPG
  6. P3 6:15BUFKyle Okposo: Interference2 min
  7. P3 8:09CBJZach Werenski: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  8. P3 13:18CBJDavid Savard: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BUF00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CBJ
46% to win54% to win
← BUF attackCBJ attack →
  1. P1 20:00Dubois won the faceoff against Larsson
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BUFCBJ
38Shots on goal37
4.2Expected goals3.4
64Shot attempts62
34Faceoffs won30
5Power plays3
6Penalty minutes10
8Hits12
15Blocked shots16
8Giveaways5
4Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestPominville – Skinner – Eichel11:25

    xG 1.20–0.60 (66%)attempts 18–11goals 2–0

  2. Berglund – Larsson – Girgensons10:30

    xG 0.54–0.38 (58%)attempts 13–4goals 0–0

  3. Sobotka – Sheary – Reinhart8:57

    xG 0.48–0.50 (49%)attempts 7–11goals 0–0

  4. Okposo – Thompson – Mittelstadt4:13

    xG 0.14–0.47 (22%)attempts 2–9goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestNelson – Dahlin10:53

    xG 1.03–0.88 (54%)attempts 16–13goals 1–1

  2. Scandella – Ristolainen3:08

    xG 0.22–0.11 (65%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  3. Bogosian – Scandella14:03

    xG 0.30–0.45 (40%)attempts 10–11goals 0–0

Columbus Blue Jackets

Forward lines

  1. bestAtkinson – Panarin – Dubois9:16

    xG 0.91–0.38 (71%)attempts 21–7goals 2–1

  2. Foligno – Jenner – Anderson7:49

    xG 0.21–0.08 (72%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  3. Nash – Sedlak – Hannikainen3:58

    xG 0.15–0.12 (57%)attempts 3–3goals 0–1

  4. Duclair – Bjorkstrand – Wennberg8:13

    xG 0.70–0.83 (46%)attempts 10–18goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestJones – Werenski13:44

    xG 1.26–0.63 (67%)attempts 22–13goals 3–1

  2. Savard – Harrington11:07

    xG 0.81–0.72 (53%)attempts 11–15goals 1–0

  3. Murray – Nutivaara12:23

    xG 0.28–0.67 (30%)attempts 9–9goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CBJ 3.4 xGBUF 4.2 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CBJBUF

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CBJ's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CBJ is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.

Excitement 97/100 · #38 of 1271 this seasonSwing 2.60 · 9 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 32% (winner's lowest chance)
BUF 100%5050%50CBJ 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +30 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 64% of the time.

CBJ winsBUF wins

Simulated goal difference (CBJ − BUF), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).