Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Oct 29, 2018·Rogers Arena, Vancouver

Minnesota Wild 2, Vancouver Canucks 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 52% of the time.

VAN winsMIN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
MIN17115017239
VAN11421126531

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 7:17VANMarkus GranlundAssists: Bo Horvat · Wrist, 0.13 xG0–1
  2. P1 7:52MINJordan GreenwayAssists: Jared Spurgeon, Charlie Coyle · Wrist, 0.27 xG1–1
  3. P2 5:15VANJake VirtanenPPAssists: Alex Biega · Wrist, 0.10 xG1–2
  4. P2 6:51VANElias PetterssonGWGAssists: Michael Del Zotto, Nikolay Goldobin · Slap, 0.07 xG1–3
  5. P2 14:37MINRyan SuterPPAssists: Mikael Granlund, Jason Zucker · Snap, 0.02 xG2–3
  6. P3 6:29VANElias PetterssonAssists: Brock Boeser · Wrist, 0.17 xG2–4
  7. P3 19:20VANBen HuttonENAssists: Antoine Roussel · Wrist, 0.74 xG2–5
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 10:57MINZach Parise: High sticking2 min
  2. P1 10:57VANErik Gudbranson: High sticking2 min
  3. P1 13:30MINEric Fehr: Slashing2 min
  4. P2 1:11VANMarkus Granlund: High sticking double minor4 min
  5. P2 4:31MINEric Staal: Interference2 min · PPG
  6. P2 12:59VANLoui Eriksson: Tripping2 min · PPG
  7. P2 19:38MINRyan Suter: Roughing2 min
  8. P3 1:29MINGreg Pateryn: High sticking2 min
  9. P3 9:05VANAlex Biega: High sticking2 min
  10. P3 11:17VANMarkus Granlund: Slashing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MIN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0VAN
46% to win54% to win
← MIN attackVAN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Koivu won the faceoff against Sutter
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MINVAN
39Shots on goal31
3.2Expected goals3.0
66Shot attempts55
34Faceoffs won31
5Power plays4
10Penalty minutes12
21Hits17
14Blocked shots15
5Giveaways5
2Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestCoyle – Read – Greenway3:59

    xG 0.73–0.09 (89%)attempts 7–5goals 1–1

  2. Staal – Read – Greenway2:22

    xG 0.20–0.01 (95%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

  3. Fehr – Foligno – Eriksson Ek6:06

    xG 0.18–0.34 (35%)attempts 8–7goals 0–0

  4. Staal – Zucker – Niederreiter8:13

    xG 0.10–0.40 (20%)attempts 5–13goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestSpurgeon – Brodin13:18

    xG 0.93–0.23 (80%)attempts 19–6goals 1–0

  2. Pateryn – Seeler11:26

    xG 0.38–0.64 (38%)attempts 12–16goals 0–1

  3. Suter – Dumba13:20

    xG 0.21–0.70 (23%)attempts 7–18goals 0–2

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestGranlund – Schaller – Horvat11:07

    xG 0.55–0.28 (66%)attempts 14–7goals 1–0

  2. Eriksson – Sutter – Roussel4:40

    xG 0.23–0.03 (89%)attempts 5–2goals 0–0

  3. Motte – Virtanen – Gaudette5:41

    xG 0.12–0.08 (61%)attempts 6–4goals 0–0

  4. Eriksson – Roussel – Gaudette2:11

    xG 0.00–0.05 (0%)attempts 0–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestGudbranson – Hutton15:45

    xG 0.85–0.39 (68%)attempts 16–18goals 1–0

  2. Pouliot – Stecher11:46

    xG 0.23–0.40 (37%)attempts 9–11goals 1–0

  3. Biega – Del Zotto8:54

    xG 0.34–0.83 (29%)attempts 10–10goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

VAN 3.0 xGMIN 3.2 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

VANMIN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

VAN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line VAN is favoured, below it MIN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 53/100 · #593 of 1271 this seasonSwing 1.21 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 51% (winner's lowest chance)
MIN 100%5050%50VAN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 52% of the time.

VAN winsMIN wins

Simulated goal difference (VAN − MIN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).