Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Oct 30, 2018·SAP Center at San Jose, San Jose

New York Rangers 4, San Jose Sharks 3 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, New York Rangers win this game 72% of the time.

SJS winsNYR wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
NYR11706211031437
SJS16014212020334

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 3:22SJSBrent BurnsAssists: Marcus Sorensen, Melker Karlsson · Slap, 0.01 xG0–1
  2. P1 4:21NYRMats ZuccarelloAssists: Kevin Shattenkirk · Wrist, 0.05 xG1–1
  3. P3 1:13NYRChris KreiderAssists: Brady Skjei, Kevin Hayes · Slap, 0.07 xG2–1
  4. P3 8:14SJSTimo MeierAssists: Brent Burns · Wrist, 0.08 xG2–2
  5. P3 10:05NYRChris KreiderAssists: Mats Zuccarello, Mika Zibanejad · Wrap-around, 0.06 xG3–2
  6. P3 19:58SJSTomas HertlAssists: Logan Couture, Timo Meier · Wrist, 0.10 xG3–3

Shootout

  1. 1. SJS Tomas Hertl stopped
  2. 2. NYR Mats Zuccarello stopped
  3. 3. SJS Logan Couture stopped
  4. 4. NYR Mika Zibanejad stopped
  5. 5. SJS Joe Pavelski stopped
  6. 6. NYR Kevin Shattenkirk scored
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 13:01SJSMelker Karlsson: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 15:45SJSTimo Meier: High sticking2 min
  3. P2 0:56NYRMika Zibanejad: Holding2 min
  4. P3 15:06SJSKevin Labanc: Too many men on the ice2 min
  5. OT 1:39SJSKevin Labanc: Tripping2 min
  6. OT 3:16NYRChris Kreider: Slashing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

NYR00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0SJS
46% to win54% to win
← NYR attackSJS attack →
  1. P1 20:00Couture won the faceoff against Zibanejad
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

NYRSJS
37Shots on goal34
4.0Expected goals2.6
63Shot attempts65
21Faceoffs won30
4Power plays2
4Penalty minutes8
28Hits14
16Blocked shots15
7Giveaways6
4Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

New York Rangers

Forward lines

  1. bestFast – Vesey – Howden7:32

    xG 0.81–0.03 (97%)attempts 12–2goals 0–0

  2. Kreider – Spooner – Hayes7:07

    xG 0.42–0.20 (68%)attempts 9–8goals 1–0

  3. Spooner – Hayes – Vesey3:06

    xG 0.00–0.02 (0%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

  4. Zuccarello – Zibanejad – Namestnikov11:24

    xG 0.25–0.29 (46%)attempts 9–11goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestShattenkirk – Smith14:03

    xG 0.97–0.31 (76%)attempts 16–11goals 2–0

  2. Skjei – DeAngelo13:34

    xG 1.14–0.69 (62%)attempts 12–18goals 1–1

  3. Staal – Pionk17:28

    xG 0.44–0.64 (41%)attempts 17–20goals 0–1

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestDonskoi – Goodrow – Suomela2:36

    xG 0.13–0.02 (84%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  2. Thornton – Pavelski – Meier4:11

    xG 0.26–0.19 (57%)attempts 7–4goals 0–0

  3. Thornton – Pavelski – Sorensen5:17

    xG 0.14–0.08 (63%)attempts 6–2goals 0–0

  4. Kane – Hertl – Labanc5:01

    xG 0.35–0.31 (53%)attempts 6–4goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestVlasic – Braun9:30

    xG 0.35–0.13 (73%)attempts 8–9goals 0–1

  2. Braun – Dillon3:19

    xG 0.19–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–0goals 0–0

  3. Vlasic – Karlsson6:24

    xG 0.37–0.28 (57%)attempts 8–5goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

SJS 2.6 xGNYR 4.0 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

SJSNYR

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

SJS's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line SJS is favoured, below it NYR. Dots are goals.

Excitement 89/100 · #147 of 1271 this seasonSwing 2.45 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 32% (winner's lowest chance)
NYR 100%5050%50SJS 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +46 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, New York Rangers win this game 72% of the time.

SJS winsNYR wins

Simulated goal difference (SJS − NYR), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).