Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Oct 31, 2018·Rogers Arena, Vancouver

Chicago Blackhawks 2, Vancouver Canucks 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 51% of the time.

VAN winsCHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CHI1911007226
VAN1618214428

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 6:56CHIBrandon SaadAssists: Chris Kunitz, Artem Anisimov · Wrist, 0.16 xG1–0
  2. P1 15:33VANJake VirtanenUnassisted · Wrist, 0.14 xG1–1
  3. P2 1:05CHIJonathan ToewsPPAssists: Erik Gustafsson, Luke Johnson · Snap, 0.13 xG2–1
  4. P2 12:24VANJake VirtanenAssists: Markus Granlund, Erik Gudbranson · Wrist, 0.05 xG2–2
  5. P3 9:23VANBrendan GaunceGWGUnassisted · Wrist, 0.11 xG2–3
  6. P3 16:33VANAntoine RousselAssists: Brendan Gaunce, Alex Biega · Deflected, 0.02 xG2–4
Penalties (5)
  1. P1 2:15VANAntoine Roussel: High sticking2 min
  2. P1 7:05CHIBrent Seabrook: Interference2 min
  3. P1 19:25VANMichael Del Zotto: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  4. P2 8:20CHIBrent Seabrook: Tripping2 min
  5. P3 1:56CHIErik Gustafsson: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0VAN
46% to win54% to win
← CHI attackVAN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Toews won the faceoff against Horvat
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CHIVAN
26Shots on goal28
2.6Expected goals2.6
51Shot attempts53
33Faceoffs won29
2Power plays3
6Penalty minutes4
12Hits28
14Blocked shots13
6Giveaways10
3Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestKunitz – Anisimov – Saad10:49

    xG 0.81–0.24 (77%)attempts 17–7goals 1–1

  2. Toews – DeBrincat – Kahun11:23

    xG 0.30–0.27 (53%)attempts 8–6goals 0–0

  3. Kruger – Hayden – Kampf6:44

    xG 0.23–0.20 (53%)attempts 6–5goals 0–0

  4. Johnson – Schmaltz – Fortin8:20

    xG 0.11–0.63 (15%)attempts 2–13goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestManning – Davidson11:24

    xG 0.33–0.16 (67%)attempts 7–4goals 0–2

  2. Keith – Jokiharju16:15

    xG 0.57–0.47 (55%)attempts 8–15goals 1–1

  3. Seabrook – Gustafsson15:29

    xG 0.70–0.98 (41%)attempts 21–16goals 0–1

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestGranlund – Virtanen – Gaudette5:05

    xG 0.40–0.17 (70%)attempts 7–2goals 0–0

  2. Roussel – Gaunce – Motte2:23

    xG 0.11–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–1goals 1–0

  3. Roussel – Gaunce – Virtanen3:00

    xG 0.18–0.09 (67%)attempts 4–2goals 1–0

  4. Goldobin – Boeser – Pettersson6:43

    xG 0.18–0.11 (62%)attempts 4–8goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestPouliot – Stecher12:04

    xG 0.41–0.09 (81%)attempts 7–4goals 1–0

  2. Biega – Hutton3:07

    xG 0.35–0.10 (78%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

  3. Del Zotto – Gudbranson2:42

    xG 0.11–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–1goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

VAN 2.6 xGCHI 2.6 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

VANCHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

VAN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line VAN is favoured, below it CHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 50/100 · #653 of 1271 this seasonSwing 1.56 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 28% (winner's lowest chance)
CHI 100%5050%50VAN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +34 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 51% of the time.

VAN winsCHI wins

Simulated goal difference (VAN − CHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).