Mon, Nov 5, 2018·TD Garden, Boston
Dallas Stars 1, Boston Bruins 2 (OT)
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Boston Bruins win this game 86% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | OT | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DAL | 14 | 09 | 010 | 02 | 125 |
| BOS | 113 | 08 | 011 | 13 | 235 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P1 3:51DALRadek FaksaSHAssists: Miro Heiskanen · Wrist, 0.09 xG1–0
- P1 5:11BOSDavid PastrnakPPAssists: Patrice Bergeron, Jake DeBrusk · Snap, 0.15 xG1–1
- OT 4:29BOSBrad MarchandPPGWGAssists: David Krejci, Torey Krug · Wrist, 0.18 xG1–2
Penalties (4)
- P1 3:25DALRoman Polak: Interference2 min · PPG
- P3 11:15BOSTorey Krug: Boarding2 min
- OT 3:16DALJason Dickinson: Too many men on the ice2 min · PPG
- OT 3:27DALEsa Lindell: Cross checking2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Seguin won the faceoff against Bergeron
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Dallas Stars
Forward lines
- Dowling – Smith – Dickinson6:22
xG 0.04–0.03 (55%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0
- Spezza – Benn – Nichushkin5:52
xG 0.19–0.21 (48%)attempts 5–7goals 0–0
- Dowling – Shore – Janmark4:29
xG 0.04–0.23 (15%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0
- Seguin – Shore – Janmark5:59
xG 0.00–0.22 (0%)attempts 0–9goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestHeatherington – Honka3:32
xG 0.10–0.05 (69%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0
- Polak – Lindell3:21
xG 0.06–0.04 (57%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0
- Lindell – Honka7:20
xG 0.22–0.24 (47%)attempts 4–9goals 0–0
Boston Bruins
Forward lines
- bestBergeron – Marchand – Pastrnak13:33
xG 0.86–0.05 (94%)attempts 14–5goals 0–0
- Backes – Heinen – Bjork9:44
xG 0.46–0.06 (88%)attempts 15–4goals 0–0
- Wagner – Kuraly – Acciari10:15
xG 0.12–0.14 (46%)attempts 7–5goals 0–0
- Krejci – Nordstrom – DeBrusk14:12
xG 0.37–0.43 (47%)attempts 18–11goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestChara – Carlo13:31
xG 0.80–0.18 (82%)attempts 17–9goals 0–0
- Moore – Krug13:57
xG 0.91–0.35 (72%)attempts 20–4goals 0–0
- Kampfer – Grzelcyk7:31
xG 0.35–0.01 (97%)attempts 8–2goals 0–0
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
BOS's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BOS is favoured, below it DAL. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Boston Bruins win this game 86% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (BOS − DAL), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).