Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Nov 6, 2018·Amalie Arena, Tampa

Edmonton Oilers 2, Tampa Bay Lightning 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 68% of the time.

TBL winsEDM wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
EDM01111519235
TBL21529111535

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:40TBLSteven StamkosAssists: Nikita Kucherov · Snap, 0.08 xG0–1
  2. P1 19:34TBLBrayden PointAssists: Yanni Gourde, Tyler Johnson · Wrist, 0.28 xG0–2
  3. P2 12:32EDMRyan StromeAssists: Oscar Klefbom · Wrist, 0.09 xG1–2
  4. P2 13:19TBLYanni GourdeGWGAssists: Ryan McDonagh, Brayden Point · Tip-in, 0.09 xG1–3
  5. P2 18:59TBLNikita KucherovAssists: Steven Stamkos, Braydon Coburn · Wrist, 0.10 xG1–4
  6. P3 0:40EDMLeon DraisaitlPPAssists: Ty Rattie, Ryan Nugent-Hopkins · Wrist, 0.12 xG2–4
  7. P3 8:23TBLNikita KucherovPPAssists: J.T. Miller, Steven Stamkos · Wrist, 0.07 xG2–5
Penalties (13)
  1. P1 6:37EDMTy Rattie: Slashing2 min
  2. P2 4:48TBLJ.T. Miller: Interference2 min
  3. P2 10:37TBLBrayden Point: Tripping2 min
  4. P2 11:04EDMConnor McDavid: Holding2 min
  5. P2 17:43EDMRyan Strome: Slashing2 min
  6. P2 17:43TBLCedric Paquette: Slashing2 min
  7. P2 19:41TBLAnton Stralman: Slashing2 min · PPG
  8. P3 5:49EDMAdam Larsson: Hooking2 min
  9. P3 7:26EDMMatt Benning: Slashing2 min · PPG
  10. P3 9:31EDMMilan Lucic: Interference2 min
  11. P3 9:31EDMMilan Lucic: Roughing2 min
  12. P3 9:31EDMMilan Lucic: Misconduct10 min
  13. P3 13:39TBLNikita Kucherov: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

EDM00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0TBL
46% to win54% to win
← EDM attackTBL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Point won the faceoff against McDavid
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

EDMTBL
35Shots on goal35
2.4Expected goals3.5
58Shot attempts57
29Faceoffs won32
4Power plays6
24Penalty minutes10
27Hits20
10Blocked shots13
6Giveaways5
5Takeaways11

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. Rattie – Nugent-Hopkins – McDavid10:06

    xG 0.49–0.57 (47%)attempts 11–10goals 0–1

  2. Rieder – Draisaitl – Caggiula9:40

    xG 0.15–0.24 (38%)attempts 10–10goals 0–1

  3. Lucic – Strome – Yamamoto7:32

    xG 0.12–0.29 (29%)attempts 6–5goals 0–0

  4. Brodziak – Kassian – Khaira6:52

    xG 0.10–0.33 (22%)attempts 3–7goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Gravel – Benning7:01

    xG 0.11–0.11 (50%)attempts 5–4goals 0–0

  2. Benning – Nurse3:31

    xG 0.01–0.19 (3%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

  3. Larsson – Klefbom14:29

    xG 0.49–0.68 (42%)attempts 15–13goals 0–0

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. bestStamkos – Kucherov – Miller9:17

    xG 0.57–0.23 (71%)attempts 15–9goals 1–0

  2. Killorn – Joseph – Cirelli7:25

    xG 0.36–0.04 (89%)attempts 10–2goals 0–0

  3. Callahan – Paquette – Erne9:38

    xG 0.45–0.20 (69%)attempts 6–5goals 0–0

  4. Johnson – Gourde – Point11:04

    xG 0.67–0.50 (57%)attempts 10–11goals 2–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestGirardi – Koekkoek10:43

    xG 0.60–0.24 (71%)attempts 14–6goals 1–0

  2. Coburn – Sergachev12:38

    xG 0.43–0.25 (63%)attempts 10–9goals 0–0

  3. Stralman – McDonagh13:13

    xG 0.69–0.62 (53%)attempts 12–15goals 2–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

TBL 3.5 xGEDM 2.4 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

TBLEDM

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

TBL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line TBL is favoured, below it EDM. Dots are goals.

Excitement 51/100 · #623 of 1271 this seasonSwing 0.90 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 54% (winner's lowest chance)
EDM 100%5050%50TBL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +15 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 68% of the time.

TBL winsEDM wins

Simulated goal difference (TBL − EDM), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).