Wed, Nov 7, 2018·Honda Center, Anaheim
Calgary Flames 2, Anaheim Ducks 3
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 64% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGY | 19 | 013 | 117 | 239 |
| ANA | 211 | 010 | 13 | 324 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P1 8:37ANAJakob SilfverbergAssists: Andrew Cogliano, Jacob Larsson · Slap, 0.06 xG0–1
- P1 11:53ANAAdam HenriqueAssists: Josh Manson, Pontus Aberg · Wrist, 0.28 xG0–2
- P1 17:10CGYMatthew TkachukPPAssists: Elias Lindholm, Mark Giordano · Tip-in, 0.13 xG1–2
- P3 6:06CGYMark JankowskiSHUnassisted · Wrist, 0.07 xG2–2
- P3 6:33ANARyan GetzlafGWGAssists: Rickard Rakell, Cam Fowler · Backhand, 0.08 xG2–3
Penalties (6)
- P1 3:44CGYDerek Ryan: Slashing2 min
- P1 17:05ANABen Street: Tripping2 min · PPG
- P1 17:49CGYMatthew Tkachuk: High sticking2 min
- P2 7:09ANAMarcus Pettersson: Hooking2 min
- P3 4:28CGYMikael Backlund: Tripping2 min
- P3 18:46ANARickard Rakell: Slashing2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Lindholm won the faceoff against Kesler
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Calgary Flames
Forward lines
- bestGaudreau – Lindholm – Monahan14:52
xG 1.05–0.26 (81%)attempts 17–9goals 0–0
- Neal – Backlund – Tkachuk13:33
xG 0.65–0.44 (59%)attempts 20–8goals 0–0
- Frolik – Bennett – Ryan6:19
xG 0.37–0.17 (68%)attempts 9–3goals 0–0
- Peluso – Jankowski – Czarnik3:42
xG 0.12–0.06 (65%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestHamonic – Hanifin15:58
xG 1.13–0.41 (73%)attempts 25–10goals 0–1
- Andersson – Välimäki11:17
xG 0.65–0.28 (70%)attempts 13–4goals 0–0
- Giordano – Brodie17:02
xG 0.67–0.47 (59%)attempts 15–15goals 0–0
Anaheim Ducks
Forward lines
- bestGetzlaf – Eaves – Rakell15:59
xG 0.68–0.49 (58%)attempts 12–15goals 1–0
- Henrique – Aberg – Lundeström9:00
xG 0.50–0.54 (48%)attempts 7–10goals 1–0
- Carrick – Street – Sherwood6:15
xG 0.07–0.62 (10%)attempts 4–11goals 0–0
- Kesler – Cogliano – Silfverberg13:20
xG 0.32–0.89 (26%)attempts 10–16goals 1–0
Defence pairs
- Pettersson – Montour8:27
xG 0.32–0.46 (41%)attempts 7–13goals 0–0
- Fowler – Manson18:35
xG 0.82–1.20 (41%)attempts 13–20goals 2–0
- Lindholm – Larsson19:09
xG 0.54–0.95 (36%)attempts 11–21goals 1–0
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
ANA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line ANA is favoured, below it CGY. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 64% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (ANA − CGY), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).