Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Nov 10, 2018·KeyBank Center, Buffalo

Vancouver Canucks 3, Buffalo Sabres 4 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 54% of the time.

BUF winsVAN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
VAN015212110021339
BUF11006219022437

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:43BUFNathan BeaulieuAssists: Kyle Okposo, Rasmus Dahlin · Snap, 0.08 xG0–1
  2. P2 18:16VANLoui ErikssonAssists: Markus Granlund, Bo Horvat · Wrist, 0.14 xG1–1
  3. P2 19:26VANJake VirtanenAssists: Antoine Roussel · Backhand, 0.05 xG2–1
  4. P3 3:44VANErik GudbransonAssists: Loui Eriksson, Antoine Roussel · Snap, 0.04 xG3–1
  5. P3 17:33BUFJeff SkinnerAssists: Sam Reinhart, Rasmus Ristolainen · Wrist, 0.15 xG3–2
  6. P3 18:13BUFSam ReinhartAssists: Rasmus Ristolainen, Rasmus Dahlin · Snap, 0.32 xG3–3

Shootout

  1. 1. BUF Jack Eichel scored
  2. 2. VAN Elias Pettersson stopped
  3. 3. BUF Sam Reinhart stopped
  4. 4. VAN Markus Granlund scored
  5. 5. BUF Casey Mittelstadt scored
  6. 6. VAN Nikolay Goldobin stopped
Penalties (6)
  1. P2 2:15VANAntoine Roussel: Interference2 min
  2. P2 10:39BUFRasmus Ristolainen: Interference2 min
  3. P3 9:31BUFJohan Larsson: Tripping2 min
  4. P3 11:24VANJake Virtanen: High sticking2 min
  5. P3 18:56BUFEvan Rodrigues: Tripping2 min
  6. OT 4:00BUFJeff Skinner: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

VAN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BUF
46% to win54% to win
← VAN attackBUF attack →
  1. P1 20:00Horvat won the faceoff against Eichel
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

VANBUF
39Shots on goal37
2.9Expected goals3.2
60Shot attempts64
29Faceoffs won34
4Power plays2
4Penalty minutes8
10Hits17
12Blocked shots10
7Giveaways10
3Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestEriksson – Roussel – Horvat5:22

    xG 0.39–0.08 (83%)attempts 7–1goals 1–0

  2. Granlund – Schaller – Motte2:04

    xG 0.12–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–0goals 0–0

  3. Virtanen – Goldobin – Pettersson10:17

    xG 0.39–0.32 (55%)attempts 14–9goals 0–0

  4. Roussel – Virtanen – Pettersson3:55

    xG 0.21–0.19 (53%)attempts 5–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestDel Zotto – Stecher13:23

    xG 0.51–0.46 (53%)attempts 18–9goals 1–0

  2. Gudbranson – Hutton16:06

    xG 0.75–0.71 (51%)attempts 15–18goals 1–0

  3. Tanev – Pouliot16:32

    xG 0.50–0.84 (37%)attempts 12–21goals 1–1

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestOkposo – Sheary – Mittelstadt7:38

    xG 0.52–0.18 (75%)attempts 8–3goals 1–0

  2. Skinner – Reinhart – Eichel2:27

    xG 0.04–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–0goals 0–0

  3. Sobotka – Reinhart – Rodrigues6:07

    xG 0.28–0.30 (49%)attempts 9–6goals 0–0

  4. Pominville – Skinner – Eichel7:15

    xG 0.53–0.58 (48%)attempts 8–10goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestBogosian – Dahlin2:12

    xG 0.09–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 0–0

  2. McCabe – Ristolainen15:46

    xG 0.70–0.62 (53%)attempts 18–14goals 0–1

  3. Beaulieu – Dahlin10:41

    xG 0.62–0.62 (50%)attempts 11–17goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BUF 3.2 xGVAN 2.9 xG
0123P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BUFVAN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BUF's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BUF is favoured, below it VAN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 90/100 · #140 of 1271 this seasonSwing 2.31 · 6 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 0% (winner's lowest chance)
VAN 100%5050%50BUF 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +43 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 54% of the time.

BUF winsVAN wins

Simulated goal difference (BUF − VAN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).