Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Nov 17, 2018·Canadian Tire Centre, Ottawa

Pittsburgh Penguins 4, Ottawa Senators 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Ottawa Senators win this game 59% of the time.

OTT winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PIT11109315435
OTT3102817625

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 11:59PITKris LetangPPAssists: Phil Kessel, Evgeni Malkin · Slap, 0.03 xG1–0
  2. P1 14:33OTTBrady TkachukAssists: Colin White · Wrist, 0.13 xG1–1
  3. P1 17:07OTTMark StoneAssists: Thomas Chabot, Ryan Dzingel · Tip-in, 0.10 xG1–2
  4. P1 18:50OTTMatt DucheneAssists: Mikkel Boedker, Drake Batherson · Tip-in, 0.13 xG1–3
  5. P2 16:35OTTMark StoneSHUnassisted · Backhand, 0.15 xG1–4
  6. P2 17:21OTTCody CeciGWGAssists: Matt Duchene, Ryan Dzingel · Wrist, 0.05 xG1–5
  7. P3 2:20PITZachary Aston-ReeseUnassisted · Tip-in, 0.01 xG2–5
  8. P3 5:34PITMatt CullenAssists: Bryan Rust, Jack Johnson · Wrist, 0.27 xG3–5
  9. P3 9:05OTTMatt DucheneAssists: Drake Batherson, Mikkel Boedker · Wrist, 0.21 xG3–6
  10. P3 16:56PITPatric HornqvistAssists: Phil Kessel, Evgeni Malkin · Tip-in, 0.14 xG4–6
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 5:38OTTDrake Batherson: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 8:23PITMatt Cullen: High sticking2 min
  3. P1 10:49OTTMagnus Paajarvi: Roughing2 min · PPG
  4. P2 2:41PITMatt Cullen: Holding2 min
  5. P2 10:23PITEvgeni Malkin: Slashing2 min
  6. P2 14:59OTTMark Borowiecki: High sticking2 min
  7. P2 18:44PITJamie Oleksiak: Roughing2 min
  8. P2 18:44OTTMark Borowiecki: Roughing2 min
  9. P2 18:44OTTChris Wideman: Cross checking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0OTT
46% to win54% to win
← PIT attackOTT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Smith won the faceoff against Malkin
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITOTT
35Shots on goal25
2.7Expected goals3.2
67Shot attempts43
29Faceoffs won35
4Power plays3
8Penalty minutes10
31Hits16
6Blocked shots16
2Giveaways6
5Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestCullen – Rust – Aston-Reese9:10

    xG 0.78–0.20 (80%)attempts 12–4goals 2–0

  2. Grant – Sprong – Simon8:37

    xG 0.20–0.08 (72%)attempts 12–5goals 0–0

  3. Malkin – Hornqvist – Pearson3:29

    xG 0.05–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 0–0

  4. Brassard – Kessel – Guentzel2:25

    xG 0.01–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–0goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestJohnson – Letang11:17

    xG 0.82–0.62 (57%)attempts 15–12goals 2–2

  2. Letang – Dumoulin2:30

    xG 0.17–0.14 (54%)attempts 2–4goals 0–0

  3. Oleksiak – Maatta12:07

    xG 0.22–0.26 (45%)attempts 8–4goals 0–0

Ottawa Senators

Forward lines

  1. bestPyatt – Smith – Paajarvi10:39

    xG 0.59–0.10 (85%)attempts 9–7goals 0–0

  2. Boedker – Duchene – Batherson8:39

    xG 0.40–0.17 (70%)attempts 6–8goals 2–0

  3. Ryan – Duchene – Dzingel2:11

    xG 0.00–0.04 (0%)attempts 0–2goals 0–0

  4. Stone – White – Tkachuk8:03

    xG 0.18–0.42 (30%)attempts 5–11goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestCeci – Lajoie12:09

    xG 0.55–0.12 (82%)attempts 8–8goals 0–0

  2. Borowiecki – DeMelo2:06

    xG 0.21–0.02 (93%)attempts 1–1goals 1–0

  3. Wideman – Chabot2:21

    xG 0.00–0.07 (0%)attempts 0–4goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

OTT 3.2 xGPIT 2.7 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

OTTPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

OTT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line OTT is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 81/100 · #263 of 1271 this seasonSwing 1.09 · 9 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 34% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50OTT 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +19 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Ottawa Senators win this game 59% of the time.

OTT winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (OTT − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).