Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Nov 21, 2018·Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul

Ottawa Senators 4, Minnesota Wild 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 85% of the time.

MIN winsOTT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
OTT04110313427
MIN21521128634

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 16:10MINJordan GreenwayAssists: Joel Eriksson Ek, Jonas Brodin · Snap, 0.11 xG0–1
  2. P1 19:49MINMathew DumbaPPAssists: Mikael Granlund, Ryan Suter · Slap, 0.13 xG0–2
  3. P2 6:00MINEric StaalPPAssists: Mikael Granlund, Ryan Suter · Slap, 0.12 xG0–3
  4. P2 12:48OTTChris TierneyAssists: Mikkel Boedker, Christian Jaros · Tip-in, 0.12 xG1–3
  5. P2 16:03MINMathew DumbaAssists: Jordan Greenway, Charlie Coyle · Wrist, 0.05 xG1–4
  6. P3 0:52OTTThomas ChabotSHAssists: Zack Smith · Slap, 0.06 xG2–4
  7. P3 11:32OTTChristian JarosAssists: Zack Smith · Wrist, 0.02 xG3–4
  8. P3 12:55OTTColin WhiteAssists: Tom Pyatt · Wrist, 0.10 xG4–4
  9. P3 14:02MINEric StaalGWGAssists: Jason Zucker, Mikael Granlund · Wrist, 0.12 xG4–5
  10. P3 19:22MINEric FehrENAssists: Zach Parise, Mikko Koivu · Wrist, 0.76 xG4–6
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 10:39MINJordan Greenway: Slashing2 min
  2. P1 17:57OTTBrady Tkachuk: Slashing2 min · PPG
  3. P1 18:54MINZach Parise: Slashing2 min
  4. P1 19:29OTTThomas Chabot: Tripping2 min
  5. P2 4:35OTTBrady Tkachuk: Roughing2 min · PPG
  6. P2 7:23MINEric Fehr: Hooking2 min
  7. P3 0:25OTTMark Borowiecki: Tripping2 min
  8. P3 5:51MINMathew Dumba: Hooking2 min
  9. P3 8:24MINJared Spurgeon: High sticking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

OTT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MIN
46% to win54% to win
← OTT attackMIN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Smith won the faceoff against Staal
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

OTTMIN
27Shots on goal34
1.6Expected goals3.7
60Shot attempts61
36Faceoffs won27
4Power plays4
8Penalty minutes10
9Hits14
14Blocked shots25
4Giveaways3
5Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Ottawa Senators

Forward lines

  1. bestStone – Tierney – Tkachuk3:15

    xG 0.08–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–0goals 0–0

  2. Boedker – Stone – Tierney5:20

    xG 0.35–0.31 (53%)attempts 9–6goals 1–0

  3. Paajarvi – Dzingel – White3:08

    xG 0.10–0.16 (39%)attempts 3–5goals 0–0

  4. Ryan – Pyatt – Smith2:36

    xG 0.08–0.19 (30%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBorowiecki – Jaros8:20

    xG 0.53–0.18 (75%)attempts 12–6goals 2–0

  2. Chabot – Jaros2:23

    xG 0.10–0.11 (48%)attempts 4–3goals 0–1

  3. Borowiecki – Ceci2:25

    xG 0.02–0.36 (5%)attempts 1–7goals 0–0

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestCoyle – Greenway – Eriksson Ek10:07

    xG 0.69–0.12 (85%)attempts 15–6goals 2–1

  2. Fehr – Foligno – Brown7:09

    xG 0.39–0.17 (69%)attempts 8–5goals 0–0

  3. Staal – Zucker – Granlund11:00

    xG 0.51–0.42 (55%)attempts 10–12goals 1–0

  4. Koivu – Parise – Niederreiter8:55

    xG 0.16–0.23 (40%)attempts 6–8goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestSuter – Spurgeon16:05

    xG 1.00–0.48 (68%)attempts 15–16goals 1–1

  2. Brodin – Dumba14:55

    xG 0.68–0.22 (75%)attempts 19–10goals 2–1

  3. Pateryn – Seeler11:32

    xG 0.40–0.31 (56%)attempts 11–13goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MIN 3.7 xGOTT 1.6 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MINOTT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it OTT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 95/100 · #77 of 1271 this seasonSwing 1.80 · 10 goals in reach · 3-goal lead cutComeback index 48% (winner's lowest chance)
OTT 100%5050%50MIN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +40 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 85% of the time.

MIN winsOTT wins

Simulated goal difference (MIN − OTT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).