Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Nov 24, 2018·BB&T Center, Sunrise

Chicago Blackhawks 5, Florida Panthers 4 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 52% of the time.

FLA winsCHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
CHI0921021814541
FLA2162180400438

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 5:48FLAMike HoffmanPPAssists: Keith Yandle, Jonathan Huberdeau · Slap, 0.05 xG0–1
  2. P1 13:40FLAJared McCannAssists: Colton Sceviour, Bogdan Kiselevich · Backhand, 0.15 xG0–2
  3. P2 0:49CHIDavid KampfAssists: Dominik Kahun, Gustav Forsling · Slap, 0.22 xG1–2
  4. P2 5:34CHIPatrick KaneAssists: Brandon Saad, Gustav Forsling · Tip-in, 0.09 xG2–2
  5. P2 8:08FLAAaron EkbladAssists: Mike Hoffman, Evgenii Dadonov · Slap, 0.07 xG2–3
  6. P2 11:30FLAFrank VatranoAssists: Jonathan Huberdeau, Nick Bjugstad · Tip-in, 0.14 xG2–4
  7. P3 9:52CHIAlexandre FortinSHUnassisted · Slap, 0.39 xG3–4
  8. P3 19:58CHIAlex DeBrincatAssists: Brandon Saad, Patrick Kane · Snap, 0.31 xG4–4
  9. OT 2:32CHIErik GustafssonGWGAssists: Nick Schmaltz, David Kampf · Snap, 0.01 xG5–4
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 4:12CHIBrandon Manning: Holding2 min · PPG
  2. P1 6:58FLATroy Brouwer: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 6:58CHIBrandon Manning: Fighting5 min
  4. P2 8:55FLAFrank Vatrano: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  5. P2 17:26CHIPatrick Kane: Hooking2 min
  6. P3 2:06FLABogdan Kiselevich: Interference2 min
  7. P3 8:11CHIPatrick Kane: High sticking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0FLA
46% to win54% to win
← CHI attackFLA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Toews won the faceoff against Barkov
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CHIFLA
41Shots on goal38
4.2Expected goals4.4
64Shot attempts62
30Faceoffs won32
2Power plays3
11Penalty minutes9
13Hits25
7Blocked shots13
9Giveaways19
9Takeaways16

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestSchmaltz – Kampf – Kahun9:13

    xG 0.53–0.18 (75%)attempts 9–8goals 1–0

  2. Toews – Saad – Hayden3:29

    xG 0.37–0.16 (70%)attempts 7–2goals 0–0

  3. Anisimov – Kane – DeBrincat5:07

    xG 0.14–0.19 (44%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

  4. Anisimov – Hayden – DeBrincat6:11

    xG 0.00–0.37 (0%)attempts 1–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestKeith – Jokiharju4:11

    xG 0.28–0.05 (84%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  2. Keith – Forsling10:49

    xG 0.40–0.48 (45%)attempts 14–10goals 0–0

  3. Keith – Seabrook2:30

    xG 0.24–0.39 (39%)attempts 2–6goals 1–1

Florida Panthers

Forward lines

  1. bestSceviour – Haley – Lammikko7:50

    xG 0.94–0.08 (92%)attempts 13–3goals 0–0

  2. Bjugstad – Huberdeau – Vatrano10:03

    xG 0.74–0.15 (83%)attempts 9–8goals 1–0

  3. Dadonov – Hoffman – Barkov12:56

    xG 1.00–0.48 (67%)attempts 13–13goals 1–0

  4. Sceviour – McCann – Hunt2:00

    xG 0.15–0.02 (90%)attempts 1–1goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestWeegar – Kiselevich14:48

    xG 1.33–0.32 (81%)attempts 23–9goals 0–0

  2. Matheson – Ekblad15:49

    xG 1.03–0.65 (61%)attempts 14–13goals 1–2

  3. Yandle – Pysyk15:14

    xG 1.02–0.73 (58%)attempts 14–14goals 2–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

FLA 4.4 xGCHI 4.2 xG
012345P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

FLACHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

FLA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line FLA is favoured, below it CHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 96/100 · #54 of 1271 this seasonSwing 2.47 · 9 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 2% (winner's lowest chance)
CHI 100%5050%50FLA 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +51 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 52% of the time.

FLA winsCHI wins

Simulated goal difference (FLA − CHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).