Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Nov 27, 2018·KeyBank Center, Buffalo

San Jose Sharks 2, Buffalo Sabres 3 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 59% of the time.

BUF winsSJS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
SJS0130821700238
BUF071911213331

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 14:42BUFRasmus RistolainenAssists: Tage Thompson, Kyle Okposo · Wrist, 0.00 xG0–1
  2. P3 4:14BUFNathan BeaulieuGWGAssists: Sam Reinhart, Casey Nelson · Tip-in, 0.11 xG0–3
  3. P3 11:29SJSJoe PavelskiAssists: Brent Burns, Timo Meier · Slap, 0.05 xG1–3
  4. P3 16:42SJSJoe PavelskiPPAssists: Logan Couture, Kevin Labanc · Wrap-around, 0.07 xG2–3
  5. OT 1:41BUFJeff SkinnerAssists: Rasmus Dahlin · Backhand, 0.03 xG0–2
Penalties (6)
  1. P2 1:23BUFEvan Rodrigues: Tripping2 min
  2. P2 9:44SJSBrenden Dillon: Tripping2 min
  3. P3 1:35BUFRasmus Dahlin: Tripping2 min
  4. P3 9:49BUFJohan Larsson: Slashing2 min
  5. P3 9:49SJSJoe Thornton: Cross checking2 min
  6. P3 15:38BUFEvan Rodrigues: Hooking2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

SJS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BUF
46% to win54% to win
← SJS attackBUF attack →
  1. P1 20:00Pavelski won the faceoff against Eichel
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

SJSBUF
38Shots on goal31
3.0Expected goals2.5
62Shot attempts53
36Faceoffs won29
3Power plays1
4Penalty minutes8
11Hits19
7Blocked shots5
11Giveaways7
7Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestPavelski – Kane – Donskoi9:40

    xG 1.05–0.11 (91%)attempts 15–5goals 0–0

  2. Couture – Hertl – Labanc3:51

    xG 0.17–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–0goals 0–0

  3. Thornton – Sorensen – Labanc7:48

    xG 0.44–0.30 (59%)attempts 7–7goals 0–0

  4. Goodrow – Karlsson – Radil6:28

    xG 0.21–0.20 (52%)attempts 6–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestKarlsson – Dillon11:02

    xG 1.01–0.02 (98%)attempts 13–2goals 0–0

  2. Burns – Karlsson7:03

    xG 0.29–0.26 (52%)attempts 9–5goals 0–0

  3. Vlasic – Karlsson2:08

    xG 0.11–0.09 (56%)attempts 1–4goals 0–0

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestSkinner – Reinhart – Eichel15:46

    xG 0.47–0.36 (56%)attempts 9–8goals 1–0

  2. Larsson – Girgensons – Elie8:57

    xG 0.40–0.55 (42%)attempts 7–12goals 0–0

  3. Pominville – Sobotka – Rodrigues9:27

    xG 0.23–0.42 (35%)attempts 6–7goals 0–0

  4. Okposo – Thompson – Mittelstadt10:54

    xG 0.38–1.01 (27%)attempts 10–18goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBogosian – Dahlin18:09

    xG 0.65–0.50 (57%)attempts 16–13goals 0–0

  2. Beaulieu – Nelson12:08

    xG 0.48–0.61 (44%)attempts 10–11goals 1–0

  3. McCabe – Ristolainen15:17

    xG 0.39–0.93 (30%)attempts 10–18goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BUF 2.5 xGSJS 3.0 xG
0123P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BUFSJS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BUF's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BUF is favoured, below it SJS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 69/100 · #399 of 1271 this seasonSwing 1.65 · 5 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 47% (winner's lowest chance)
SJS 100%5050%50BUF 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +43 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 59% of the time.

BUF winsSJS wins

Simulated goal difference (BUF − SJS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).