Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Dec 2, 2018·Capital One Arena, Washington

Anaheim Ducks 6, Washington Capitals 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 62% of the time.

WSH winsANA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
ANA192937625
WSH31128013532

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:41WSHNicklas BackstromAssists: Alex Ovechkin, John Carlson · Wrist, 0.15 xG0–1
  2. P1 6:08WSHChandler StephensonAssists: Nic Dowd, Dmitrij Jaskin · Wrist, 0.02 xG0–2
  3. P1 9:24ANARyan GetzlafAssists: Rickard Rakell, Pontus Aberg · Wrist, 0.24 xG1–2
  4. P1 13:19WSHTom WilsonPPAssists: John Carlson, Evgeny Kuznetsov · Tip-in, 0.13 xG1–3
  5. P2 4:59WSHEvgeny KuznetsovAssists: Brett Connolly · Wrist, 0.14 xG1–4
  6. P2 13:30WSHNic DowdAssists: Chandler Stephenson, Dmitrij Jaskin · Deflected, 0.16 xG1–5
  7. P2 14:31ANAAndrew CoglianoAssists: Jacob Larsson, Ryan Getzlaf · Wrist, 0.31 xG2–5
  8. P2 15:26ANARickard RakellAssists: Adam Henrique · Wrist, 0.24 xG3–5
  9. P3 7:16ANAPontus AbergPPAssists: Hampus Lindholm, Ondrej Kase · Wrist, 0.04 xG4–5
  10. P3 9:01ANAHampus LindholmPPAssists: Ryan Kesler, Ondrej Kase · Wrist, 0.18 xG5–5
  11. P3 14:55ANAPontus AbergGWGAssists: Ryan Getzlaf, Kiefer Sherwood · Wrist, 0.16 xG6–5
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 13:06ANARickard Rakell: Boarding2 min · PPG
  2. P1 16:41ANARyan Getzlaf: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  3. P2 4:59ANAPontus Aberg: Delaying game bench2 min
  4. P3 1:56WSHEvgeny Kuznetsov: Slashing2 min
  5. P3 3:41ANANick Ritchie: Tripping2 min
  6. P3 6:25WSHDmitry Orlov: Boarding2 min · PPG
  7. P3 8:10WSHDmitry Orlov: Boarding2 min · PPG
  8. P3 12:48ANAKiefer Sherwood: Boarding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ANA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0WSH
46% to win54% to win
← ANA attackWSH attack →
  1. P1 20:00Backstrom won the faceoff against Getzlaf
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ANAWSH
25Shots on goal32
3.0Expected goals2.4
49Shot attempts55
27Faceoffs won35
3Power plays5
10Penalty minutes6
19Hits9
14Blocked shots12
9Giveaways7
9Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestHenrique – Rakell – Kase4:07

    xG 0.41–0.12 (78%)attempts 4–3goals 1–0

  2. Getzlaf – Rakell – Aberg6:05

    xG 0.48–0.39 (55%)attempts 7–6goals 1–2

  3. Kesler – Cogliano – Silfverberg10:32

    xG 0.27–0.22 (55%)attempts 9–12goals 0–0

  4. Henrique – Ritchie – Kase4:29

    xG 0.10–0.10 (50%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestLindholm – Montour15:43

    xG 0.71–0.27 (72%)attempts 18–15goals 0–1

  2. Manson – Larsson14:28

    xG 0.61–0.37 (62%)attempts 9–7goals 1–0

  3. Dotchin – Pettersson6:09

    xG 0.47–0.28 (62%)attempts 6–8goals 1–2

Washington Capitals

Forward lines

  1. bestKuznetsov – Connolly – Vrana10:31

    xG 0.65–0.50 (57%)attempts 13–9goals 1–1

  2. Dowd – Jaskin – Stephenson8:18

    xG 0.38–0.26 (59%)attempts 9–5goals 2–0

  3. Eller – Smith-Pelly – Burakovsky9:23

    xG 0.17–0.22 (44%)attempts 5–5goals 0–0

  4. Ovechkin – Backstrom – Wilson12:55

    xG 0.39–1.09 (27%)attempts 12–14goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. Carlson – Kempny13:23

    xG 0.88–0.83 (51%)attempts 19–15goals 2–1

  2. Carlson – Orlov2:05

    xG 0.00–0.02 (0%)attempts 0–2goals 0–0

  3. Djoos – Bowey12:20

    xG 0.42–0.48 (46%)attempts 9–11goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

WSH 2.4 xGANA 3.0 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

WSHANA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

WSH's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line WSH is favoured, below it ANA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 96/100 · #51 of 1271 this seasonSwing 1.94 · 10 goals in reach · 4-goal lead cutComeback index 1% (winner's lowest chance)
ANA 100%5050%50WSH 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +38 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 62% of the time.

WSH winsANA wins

Simulated goal difference (WSH − ANA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).