Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Dec 6, 2018·T-Mobile Arena, Paradise

Chicago Blackhawks 3, Vegas Golden Knights 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 51% of the time.

VGK winsCHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CHI01021718335
VGK215011210436

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:28VGKReilly SmithPPAssists: Max Pacioretty, Jonathan Marchessault · Wrist, 0.21 xG0–1
  2. P1 8:14VGKDeryk EngellandAssists: Reilly Smith, William Karlsson · Wrist, 0.03 xG0–2
  3. P2 4:00CHIJonathan ToewsAssists: David Kampf, Duncan Keith · Wrist, 0.19 xG1–2
  4. P2 16:15CHIDylan StromeAssists: Patrick Kane, Duncan Keith · Wrist, 0.04 xG2–2
  5. P3 7:14CHIArtem AnisimovUnassisted · Backhand, 0.10 xG3–2
  6. P3 7:55VGKJonathan MarchessaultAssists: Reilly Smith, Shea Theodore · Wrist, 0.02 xG3–3
  7. P3 8:07VGKAlex TuchGWGAssists: Max Pacioretty · Wrist, 0.06 xG3–4
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 1:19CHIArtem Anisimov: Tripping2 min · PPG
  2. P1 12:33VGKColin Miller: Slashing2 min
  3. P1 15:13VGKJonathan Marchessault: Tripping2 min
  4. P2 4:17VGKShea Theodore: Tripping2 min
  5. P2 4:45CHIBrent Seabrook: Tripping2 min
  6. P2 8:35VGKTomas Nosek: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0VGK
46% to win54% to win
← CHI attackVGK attack →
  1. P1 20:00Eakin won the faceoff against Toews
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CHIVGK
35Shots on goal36
3.3Expected goals3.3
79Shot attempts60
36Faceoffs won23
4Power plays2
4Penalty minutes8
22Hits20
11Blocked shots22
8Giveaways8
14Takeaways17

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestAnisimov – Kane – Kahun11:20

    xG 0.51–0.44 (54%)attempts 15–9goals 1–0

  2. Perlini – Strome – DeBrincat5:07

    xG 0.21–0.21 (50%)attempts 5–5goals 0–0

  3. Kruger – Hayden – Martinsen6:20

    xG 0.24–0.35 (40%)attempts 7–6goals 0–0

  4. Kane – Strome – DeBrincat7:14

    xG 0.18–0.39 (32%)attempts 8–11goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestKeith – Rutta3:12

    xG 0.49–0.18 (73%)attempts 6–3goals 1–0

  2. Keith – Jokiharju9:29

    xG 0.70–0.41 (63%)attempts 11–9goals 1–0

  3. Keith – Seabrook2:30

    xG 0.18–0.02 (91%)attempts 5–2goals 0–0

Vegas Golden Knights

Forward lines

  1. bestLindberg – Carpenter – Nosek7:40

    xG 0.38–0.04 (91%)attempts 11–4goals 0–0

  2. Reaves – Carrier – Bellemare8:32

    xG 0.23–0.08 (74%)attempts 5–5goals 0–0

  3. Smith – Karlsson – Marchessault11:40

    xG 0.56–0.52 (52%)attempts 13–18goals 2–0

  4. Pacioretty – Eakin – Tuch10:39

    xG 0.33–0.91 (26%)attempts 9–15goals 1–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestEngelland – Theodore16:02

    xG 0.76–0.63 (55%)attempts 21–16goals 2–1

  2. McNabb – Schmidt18:09

    xG 0.97–1.02 (49%)attempts 20–22goals 1–1

  3. Holden – Miller10:50

    xG 0.18–0.72 (20%)attempts 5–15goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

VGK 3.3 xGCHI 3.3 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

VGKCHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

VGK's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line VGK is favoured, below it CHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 81/100 · #266 of 1271 this seasonSwing 1.96 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 20% (winner's lowest chance)
CHI 100%5050%50VGK 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +33 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 51% of the time.

VGK winsCHI wins

Simulated goal difference (VGK − CHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).