Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Dec 7, 2018·Rogers Place, Edmonton

Minnesota Wild 2, Edmonton Oilers 7

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 57% of the time.

EDM winsMIN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
MIN19014110233
EDM31309410732

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:14EDMLeon DraisaitlAssists: Connor McDavid · Snap, 0.14 xG0–1
  2. P1 7:44EDMRyan Nugent-HopkinsAssists: Jujhar Khaira, Darnell Nurse · Wrist, 0.34 xG0–2
  3. P1 8:42EDMConnor McDavidGWGAssists: Kris Russell, Kevin Gravel · Wrist, 0.07 xG0–3
  4. P1 10:38MINMarcus FolignoAssists: Matt Hendricks, JT Brown · Wrist, 0.03 xG1–3
  5. P3 1:51EDMZack KassianAssists: Milan Lucic, Matt Benning · Snap, 0.06 xG1–4
  6. P3 7:32MINNino NiederreiterAssists: Zach Parise, Charlie Coyle · Tip-in, 0.11 xG2–4
  7. P3 10:34EDMLeon DraisaitlAssists: Connor McDavid · Snap, 0.23 xG2–5
  8. P3 13:48EDMAlex ChiassonAssists: Jujhar Khaira · Wrist, 0.10 xG2–6
  9. P3 17:09EDMDarnell NurseAssists: Leon Draisaitl, Connor McDavid · Snap, 0.17 xG2–7
Penalties (3)
  1. P2 6:06EDMValentin Zykov: Holding2 min
  2. P2 10:50EDMOscar Klefbom: Holding the stick2 min
  3. P3 17:48MINJoel Eriksson Ek: Slashing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MIN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0EDM
46% to win54% to win
← MIN attackEDM attack →
  1. P1 20:00Nugent-Hopkins won the faceoff against Granlund
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MINEDM
33Shots on goal32
3.5Expected goals4.0
61Shot attempts63
24Faceoffs won33
2Power plays1
2Penalty minutes4
29Hits35
16Blocked shots14
17Giveaways15
11Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestParise – Coyle – Granlund8:35

    xG 1.13–0.86 (57%)attempts 10–15goals 0–3

  2. Staal – Zucker – Niederreiter8:08

    xG 0.86–0.70 (55%)attempts 12–10goals 0–0

  3. Parise – Coyle – Niederreiter4:05

    xG 0.22–0.09 (70%)attempts 6–3goals 1–1

  4. Fehr – Greenway – Eriksson Ek12:50

    xG 0.24–0.29 (46%)attempts 12–9goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSuter – Dumba12:39

    xG 1.46–0.96 (60%)attempts 17–12goals 1–1

  2. Pateryn – Seeler12:34

    xG 0.77–0.32 (70%)attempts 15–9goals 1–2

  3. Spurgeon – Brodin9:03

    xG 0.17–0.31 (36%)attempts 8–5goals 0–1

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. bestSpooner – Rattie – Zykov9:41

    xG 0.50–0.00 (100%)attempts 8–3goals 0–0

  2. Nugent-Hopkins – Khaira – Puljujarvi11:52

    xG 0.87–0.51 (63%)attempts 13–11goals 1–1

  3. Chiasson – Draisaitl – McDavid17:27

    xG 1.13–1.32 (46%)attempts 23–24goals 3–0

  4. Brodziak – Lucic – Kassian9:26

    xG 0.52–1.10 (32%)attempts 8–13goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestLarsson – Klefbom17:48

    xG 1.39–1.26 (52%)attempts 21–18goals 2–0

  2. Gravel – Benning9:56

    xG 0.50–0.39 (57%)attempts 10–10goals 2–0

  3. Russell – Nurse17:43

    xG 0.54–1.32 (29%)attempts 13–24goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

EDM 4.0 xGMIN 3.5 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

EDMMIN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

EDM's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line EDM is favoured, below it MIN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 51/100 · #634 of 1271 this seasonSwing 0.73 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 54% (winner's lowest chance)
MIN 100%5050%50EDM 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +14 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 57% of the time.

EDM winsMIN wins

Simulated goal difference (EDM − MIN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).