Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Dec 11, 2018·Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul

Montréal Canadiens 1, Minnesota Wild 7

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 68% of the time.

MIN winsMTL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
MTL06014110130
MIN1948215732

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 14:01MINNino NiederreiterAssists: Jonas Brodin, Zach Parise · Tip-in, 0.23 xG0–1
  2. P2 11:11MINMathew DumbaPPGWGAssists: Mikael Granlund, Zach Parise · Slap, 0.06 xG0–2
  3. P2 12:33MINCharlie CoyleSHAssists: Marcus Foligno · Backhand, 0.09 xG0–3
  4. P2 14:58MINEric StaalAssists: Mikael Granlund · Backhand, 0.27 xG0–4
  5. P2 19:57MINJared SpurgeonPPAssists: Jason Zucker, Charlie Coyle · Wrist, 0.22 xG0–5
  6. P3 0:44MINMathew DumbaPPAssists: Mikael Granlund, Ryan Suter · Wrist, 0.06 xG0–6
  7. P3 2:41MTLJeff PetryAssists: Michael Chaput, Andrew Shaw · Slap, 0.03 xG1–6
  8. P3 6:10MINZach ParisePPAssists: Jared Spurgeon, Ryan Suter · Wrist, 0.23 xG1–7
Penalties (10)
  1. P2 10:00MTLShea Weber: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  2. P2 12:20MINEric Fehr: Tripping2 min
  3. P2 15:12MTLNicolas Deslauriers: Fighting5 min · PPG
  4. P2 15:12MINNick Seeler: Fighting5 min
  5. P2 18:22MTLAndrew Shaw: Slashing2 min
  6. P3 0:22MTLBrendan Gallagher: High sticking2 min · PPG
  7. P3 5:44MTLMichael Chaput: Tripping2 min · PPG
  8. P3 15:38MTLMax Domi: Misconduct10 min
  9. P3 15:38MINJT Brown: Misconduct10 min
  10. P3 15:38MTLAndrew Shaw: Misconduct10 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MTL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MIN
46% to win54% to win
← MTL attackMIN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Danault won the faceoff against Staal
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MTLMIN
30Shots on goal32
1.8Expected goals2.9
62Shot attempts51
24Faceoffs won28
1Power plays4
33Penalty minutes17
19Hits17
8Blocked shots17
5Giveaways8
4Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Montréal Canadiens

Forward lines

  1. bestTatar – Gallagher – Danault11:12

    xG 0.62–0.20 (76%)attempts 18–5goals 0–0

  2. Byron – Lehkonen – Domi3:21

    xG 0.40–0.18 (69%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0

  3. Deslauriers – Chaput – Agostino9:36

    xG 0.30–0.14 (69%)attempts 13–8goals 1–0

  4. Byron – Lehkonen – Kotkaniemi5:17

    xG 0.04–0.07 (36%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBenn – Juulsen13:10

    xG 0.63–0.25 (72%)attempts 16–10goals 0–0

  2. Weber – Kulak18:53

    xG 0.66–0.57 (54%)attempts 22–16goals 0–0

  3. Petry – Schlemko14:30

    xG 0.11–0.85 (11%)attempts 11–12goals 1–2

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestStaal – Zucker – Granlund11:49

    xG 0.57–0.07 (89%)attempts 12–10goals 1–0

  2. Fehr – Foligno – Brown9:01

    xG 0.38–0.24 (62%)attempts 10–8goals 0–1

  3. Greenway – Eriksson Ek – Kunin12:01

    xG 0.23–0.14 (61%)attempts 7–9goals 0–0

  4. Parise – Coyle – Niederreiter14:01

    xG 0.76–0.79 (49%)attempts 10–16goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSuter – Dumba15:28

    xG 0.56–0.16 (78%)attempts 9–14goals 1–0

  2. Pateryn – Seeler15:02

    xG 0.59–0.41 (59%)attempts 14–14goals 0–0

  3. Spurgeon – Brodin15:25

    xG 0.70–0.62 (53%)attempts 14–12goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MIN 2.9 xGMTL 1.8 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MINMTL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it MTL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 13/100 · #1093 of 1271 this seasonSwing 0.51 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 53% (winner's lowest chance)
MTL 100%5050%50MIN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +17 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 68% of the time.

MIN winsMTL wins

Simulated goal difference (MIN − MTL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).