Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Dec 13, 2018·Bridgestone Arena, Nashville

Vancouver Canucks 3, Nashville Predators 4 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 77% of the time.

NSH winsVAN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
VAN17052901322
NSH281901512434

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 5:52NSHRyan HartmanAssists: Dan Hamhuis · Wrist, 0.05 xG0–1
  2. P1 8:40NSHNick BoninoAssists: Colton Sissons, Roman Josi · Wrist, 0.05 xG0–2
  3. P1 15:15VANJay BeagleSHAssists: Markus Granlund · Backhand, 0.23 xG1–2
  4. P2 11:05NSHCalle JarnkrokAssists: Kyle Turris, Yannick Weber · Tip-in, 0.13 xG1–3
  5. P3 15:55VANBrock BoeserPPAssists: Alexander Edler, Elias Pettersson · Slap, 0.05 xG2–3
  6. P3 19:16VANBo HorvatSHAssists: Nikolay Goldobin, Ben Hutton · Wrist, 0.27 xG3–3
  7. OT 3:05NSHColton SissonsGWGAssists: Nick Bonino, Mattias Ekholm · Wrist, 0.26 xG3–4
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 9:07NSHRocco Grimaldi: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  2. P1 10:30NSHPekka Rinne: Tripping2 min
  3. P1 13:31VANAntoine Roussel: Slashing2 min
  4. P2 4:23NSHKyle Turris: Holding2 min
  5. P3 2:45VANAlexander Edler: Interference2 min
  6. P3 15:11NSHRoman Josi: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  7. P3 16:50NSHDan Hamhuis: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  8. P3 18:01VANAlexander Edler: Slashing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

VAN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0NSH
46% to win54% to win
← VAN attackNSH attack →
  1. P1 20:00Jarnkrok won the faceoff against Granlund
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

VANNSH
22Shots on goal34
2.1Expected goals3.8
40Shot attempts63
33Faceoffs won34
5Power plays3
6Penalty minutes10
17Hits20
15Blocked shots11
13Giveaways14
1Takeaways10

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestLeivo – Boeser – Pettersson5:07

    xG 0.21–0.14 (61%)attempts 2–8goals 0–1

  2. Leivo – Virtanen – Pettersson2:44

    xG 0.00–0.00attempts 0–1goals 0–0

  3. Horvat – Virtanen – Goldobin3:33

    xG 0.06–0.12 (33%)attempts 2–4goals 0–0

  4. Horvat – Goldobin – Boeser6:36

    xG 0.19–0.27 (41%)attempts 4–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Edler – Tanev14:06

    xG 0.44–0.41 (52%)attempts 6–15goals 0–0

  2. Biega – Pouliot17:00

    xG 0.51–0.90 (36%)attempts 11–18goals 0–1

  3. Hutton – Stecher14:26

    xG 0.14–0.91 (13%)attempts 8–18goals 0–2

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestTurris – Smith – Jarnkrok11:31

    xG 0.96–0.43 (69%)attempts 17–8goals 1–0

  2. Johansen – Hartman – Fiala10:07

    xG 0.54–0.11 (83%)attempts 14–3goals 1–0

  3. Grimaldi – Salomaki – Gaudreau7:07

    xG 0.36–0.12 (74%)attempts 10–2goals 0–0

  4. Bonino – Watson – Sissons10:54

    xG 0.11–0.19 (36%)attempts 7–6goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestWeber – Irwin11:53

    xG 0.85–0.02 (98%)attempts 21–4goals 1–0

  2. Hamhuis – Ekholm15:11

    xG 0.65–0.21 (75%)attempts 14–7goals 1–0

  3. Josi – Ellis17:37

    xG 0.62–0.71 (47%)attempts 15–12goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

NSH 3.8 xGVAN 2.1 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

NSHVAN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

NSH's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NSH is favoured, below it VAN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 81/100 · #255 of 1271 this seasonSwing 1.98 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 47% (winner's lowest chance)
VAN 100%5050%50NSH 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +35 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 77% of the time.

NSH winsVAN wins

Simulated goal difference (NSH − VAN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).