Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Dec 14, 2018·Rogers Place, Edmonton

Philadelphia Flyers 1, Edmonton Oilers 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 60% of the time.

EDM winsPHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PHI09010113132
EDM172817422

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 12:37EDMAlex ChiassonAssists: Leon Draisaitl, Connor McDavid · Snap, 0.15 xG0–1
  2. P2 12:37EDMConnor McDavidGWGAssists: Leon Draisaitl, Darnell Nurse · Wrist, 0.09 xG0–2
  3. P2 14:08EDMAdam LarssonAssists: Ryan Spooner, Darnell Nurse · Wrist, 0.04 xG0–3
  4. P3 10:03PHISean CouturierAssists: Jakub Voracek, Claude Giroux · Tip-in, 0.11 xG1–3
  5. P3 19:24EDMConnor McDavidENAssists: Leon Draisaitl · Wrist, 0.77 xG1–4
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 13:49EDMJason Garrison: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 16:26PHIClaude Giroux: Slashing2 min
  3. P2 3:25EDMDrake Caggiula: High sticking double minor4 min
  4. P2 8:42PHIWayne Simmonds: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  5. P2 15:05EDMMatt Benning: Interference2 min
  6. P3 16:28EDMJesse Puljujarvi: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0EDM
46% to win54% to win
← PHI attackEDM attack →
  1. P1 20:00Couturier won the faceoff against Nugent-Hopkins
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PHIEDM
32Shots on goal22
3.1Expected goals2.6
59Shot attempts39
33Faceoffs won24
5Power plays2
4Penalty minutes10
16Hits33
10Blocked shots16
11Giveaways11
8Takeaways15

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestVoracek – Simmonds – Couturier7:25

    xG 0.28–0.08 (77%)attempts 7–2goals 0–0

  2. Weise – Laughton – Raffl5:40

    xG 0.25–0.09 (75%)attempts 6–2goals 0–0

  3. Voracek – Couturier – Raffl3:50

    xG 0.14–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–0goals 0–0

  4. Simmonds – Weise – Laughton2:22

    xG 0.13–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–0goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMacDonald – Gudas3:37

    xG 0.60–0.02 (97%)attempts 6–2goals 0–0

  2. Gostisbehere – Hagg6:50

    xG 0.70–0.13 (84%)attempts 11–3goals 0–0

  3. Sanheim – Provorov5:49

    xG 0.24–0.09 (74%)attempts 6–8goals 1–0

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. bestNugent-Hopkins – Khaira – Puljujarvi9:33

    xG 0.25–0.14 (63%)attempts 7–4goals 0–0

  2. Brodziak – Kassian – Rieder5:12

    xG 0.14–0.24 (37%)attempts 7–5goals 0–0

  3. Brodziak – Lucic – Kassian4:05

    xG 0.03–0.33 (7%)attempts 1–8goals 0–0

  4. Lucic – Spooner – Caggiula5:26

    xG 0.11–0.50 (19%)attempts 6–3goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. Garrison – Benning11:20

    xG 0.25–0.59 (30%)attempts 5–7goals 1–0

  2. Larsson – Nurse17:01

    xG 0.61–1.07 (36%)attempts 12–22goals 2–1

  3. Gravel – Jones10:57

    xG 0.26–0.88 (23%)attempts 11–12goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

EDM 2.6 xGPHI 3.1 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

EDMPHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

EDM's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line EDM is favoured, below it PHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 22/100 · #959 of 1271 this seasonSwing 0.63 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 53% (winner's lowest chance)
PHI 100%5050%50EDM 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +17 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 60% of the time.

EDM winsPHI wins

Simulated goal difference (EDM − PHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).