Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Dec 16, 2018·United Center, Chicago

San Jose Sharks 7, Chicago Blackhawks 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 85% of the time.

CHI winsSJS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
SJS28314221743
CHI350807320

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 2:34CHIAlex DeBrincatAssists: Erik Gustafsson · Wrist, 0.08 xG0–1
  2. P1 3:21CHIDylan StromeAssists: Connor Murphy, Patrick Kane · Tip-in, 0.08 xG0–2
  3. P1 9:58SJSMelker KarlssonAssists: Lukas Radil, Brent Burns · Wrist, 0.02 xG1–2
  4. P1 10:40SJSMarcus SorensenAssists: Joe Thornton, Kevin Labanc · Backhand, 0.14 xG2–2
  5. P1 12:54CHIBrendan PerliniAssists: Dylan Sikura, Brent Seabrook · Wrist, 0.23 xG2–3
  6. P2 4:21SJSEvander KanePPAssists: Brent Burns, Erik Karlsson · Wrist, 0.31 xG3–3
  7. P2 7:36SJSBarclay GoodrowGWGAssists: Justin Braun, Melker Karlsson · Tip-in, 0.09 xG4–3
  8. P2 16:16SJSLogan CoutureAssists: Brenden Dillon, Evander Kane · Tip-in, 0.12 xG5–3
  9. P3 13:03SJSKevin LabancPPAssists: Brent Burns, Tomas Hertl · Wrist, 0.09 xG6–3
  10. P3 18:27SJSTomas HertlAssists: Logan Couture, Timo Meier · Wrist, 0.25 xG7–3
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 13:53SJSBrenden Dillon: Slashing2 min
  2. P1 18:30CHIDylan Strome: Slashing2 min
  3. P1 18:30SJSEvander Kane: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  4. P1 19:14SJSTimo Meier: Tripping2 min
  5. P2 2:48CHIDavid Kampf: Broken stick2 min · PPG
  6. P2 8:33SJSEvander Kane: Tripping2 min
  7. P3 7:13SJSKevin Labanc: Tripping2 min
  8. P3 11:27CHIPatrick Kane: Tripping2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

SJS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CHI
46% to win54% to win
← SJS attackCHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Pavelski won the faceoff against Strome
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

SJSCHI
43Shots on goal20
4.1Expected goals1.8
66Shot attempts39
28Faceoffs won28
2Power plays4
10Penalty minutes6
23Hits23
16Blocked shots14
12Giveaways13
10Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestGoodrow – Karlsson – Radil9:04

    xG 0.60–0.00 (100%)attempts 11–2goals 2–0

  2. Couture – Hertl – Meier9:36

    xG 0.63–0.06 (92%)attempts 12–5goals 1–0

  3. Thornton – Sorensen – Labanc8:51

    xG 0.59–0.51 (53%)attempts 12–6goals 1–1

  4. Pavelski – Kane – Donskoi12:07

    xG 0.27–0.70 (28%)attempts 8–13goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestVlasic – Braun14:12

    xG 1.36–0.43 (76%)attempts 20–10goals 2–1

  2. Karlsson – Dillon14:00

    xG 1.03–0.33 (76%)attempts 17–7goals 2–0

  3. Burns – Simek12:06

    xG 0.24–0.53 (31%)attempts 10–7goals 1–0

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestPerlini – Sikura – Kampf9:45

    xG 0.60–0.33 (65%)attempts 9–12goals 1–1

  2. Toews – Saad – Kahun8:44

    xG 0.28–0.41 (40%)attempts 5–12goals 0–0

  3. Kane – Strome – DeBrincat14:39

    xG 0.49–0.88 (36%)attempts 14–13goals 2–1

  4. Kruger – Hayden – Martinsen7:21

    xG 0.07–0.73 (9%)attempts 1–9goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. Keith – Murphy2:30

    xG 0.00–0.01 (0%)attempts 0–1goals 0–0

  2. Seabrook – Gustafsson8:57

    xG 0.41–0.48 (46%)attempts 5–10goals 1–2

  3. Seabrook – Dahlstrom2:38

    xG 0.00–0.11 (0%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CHI 1.8 xGSJS 4.1 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CHISJS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CHI is favoured, below it SJS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 83/100 · #234 of 1271 this seasonSwing 1.59 · 9 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 18% (winner's lowest chance)
SJS 100%5050%50CHI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +22 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 85% of the time.

CHI winsSJS wins

Simulated goal difference (CHI − SJS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).