Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Dec 20, 2018·Nationwide Arena, Columbus

New Jersey Devils 1, Columbus Blue Jackets 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Columbus Blue Jackets win this game 69% of the time.

CBJ winsNJD wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
NJD05110015130
CBJ117110011238

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:17CBJNick FolignoAssists: Pierre-Luc Dubois, Seth Jones · Wrist, 0.12 xG0–1
  2. P2 1:15CBJCam AtkinsonGWGUnassisted · Wrist, 0.33 xG0–2
  3. P2 10:39NJDTaylor HallAssists: Kyle Palmieri · Wrist, 0.08 xG1–2
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 11:58NJDKyle Palmieri: Interference2 min
  2. P1 17:45NJDBrian Boyle: Roughing2 min
  3. P1 17:45NJDBrett Seney: Fighting5 min
  4. P1 17:45CBJBrandon Dubinsky: Fighting5 min
  5. P2 1:15NJDDamon Severson: Penalty shot hooking on breakaway0 min
  6. P2 2:39NJDSami Vatanen: Holding2 min
  7. P2 10:57CBJZach Werenski: High sticking2 min
  8. P2 17:57NJDKyle Palmieri: Tripping2 min
  9. P3 7:49CBJBoone Jenner: Holding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

NJD00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CBJ
46% to win54% to win
← NJD attackCBJ attack →
  1. P1 20:00Wennberg won the faceoff against Zajac
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

NJDCBJ
30Shots on goal38
2.9Expected goals4.2
45Shot attempts63
27Faceoffs won22
2Power plays4
13Penalty minutes9
22Hits15
15Blocked shots9
4Giveaways3
8Takeaways13

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

New Jersey Devils

Forward lines

  1. bestPalmieri – Hall – Hischier6:11

    xG 0.18–0.02 (91%)attempts 4–4goals 1–0

  2. Wood – Zacha – Bratt2:23

    xG 0.09–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 0–0

  3. Johansson – Palmieri – Hischier4:06

    xG 0.12–0.18 (39%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

  4. Wood – Quenneville – Zacha3:28

    xG 0.14–0.28 (33%)attempts 2–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestVatanen – Santini4:48

    xG 0.25–0.12 (68%)attempts 5–4goals 0–0

  2. Greene – Santini2:13

    xG 0.10–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 0–0

  3. Vatanen – Butcher4:59

    xG 0.16–0.09 (65%)attempts 3–4goals 1–0

Columbus Blue Jackets

Forward lines

  1. bestDuclair – Bjorkstrand – Wennberg2:30

    xG 0.51–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–0goals 0–0

  2. Atkinson – Panarin – Dubois12:40

    xG 0.56–0.36 (61%)attempts 10–7goals 0–0

  3. Dubinsky – Nash – Hannikainen8:56

    xG 0.24–0.15 (62%)attempts 5–8goals 0–1

  4. Foligno – Jenner – Anderson2:20

    xG 0.13–0.08 (64%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMurray – Jones16:44

    xG 0.78–0.21 (79%)attempts 14–8goals 1–1

  2. Savard – Werenski15:40

    xG 1.14–0.84 (58%)attempts 15–11goals 0–0

  3. Murray – Nutivaara2:00

    xG 0.05–0.02 (68%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CBJ 4.2 xGNJD 2.9 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CBJNJD

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CBJ's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CBJ is favoured, below it NJD. Dots are goals.

Excitement 17/100 · #1042 of 1271 this seasonSwing 0.90 · 3 goals in reachComeback index 54% (winner's lowest chance)
NJD 100%5050%50CBJ 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +14 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Columbus Blue Jackets win this game 69% of the time.

CBJ winsNJD wins

Simulated goal difference (CBJ − NJD), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).