Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Dec 20, 2018·American Airlines Center, Dallas

Chicago Blackhawks 5, Dallas Stars 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 69% of the time.

DAL winsCHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CHI21216211529
DAL01411014228

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:12CHIAlex DeBrincatAssists: Dylan Sikura, David Kampf · Wrist, 0.05 xG1–0
  2. P1 17:23CHIErik GustafssonPPAssists: Alex DeBrincat, Patrick Kane · Slap, 0.05 xG2–0
  3. P2 1:56CHIPatrick KaneGWGAssists: Artem Anisimov, Connor Murphy · Backhand, 0.09 xG3–0
  4. P2 8:15DALTyler SeguinAssists: Jamie Benn, Denis Gurianov · Wrist, 0.10 xG3–1
  5. P3 6:16DALTaylor FedunAssists: Jamie Benn, Alexander Radulov · Wrist, 0.14 xG3–2
  6. P3 18:10CHIPatrick KaneENAssists: David Kampf · Wrist, 0.70 xG4–2
  7. P3 18:50CHIBrendan PerliniENAssists: Alex DeBrincat · Backhand, 0.75 xG5–2
Penalties (2)
  1. P1 2:29CHIJonathan Toews: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 16:17DALAlexander Radulov: Slashing2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0DAL
46% to win54% to win
← CHI attackDAL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Toews won the faceoff against Seguin
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CHIDAL
29Shots on goal28
3.7Expected goals2.7
53Shot attempts65
28Faceoffs won33
1Power plays1
2Penalty minutes2
9Hits23
14Blocked shots14
13Giveaways24
9Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestToews – Saad – Kahun13:11

    xG 0.47–0.32 (59%)attempts 13–8goals 0–1

  2. Anisimov – Kane – Strome14:04

    xG 0.20–0.24 (46%)attempts 10–10goals 1–0

  3. Johnson – Hayden – Perlini6:49

    xG 0.52–0.73 (41%)attempts 7–15goals 0–0

  4. Sikura – DeBrincat – Kampf11:32

    xG 0.19–0.41 (31%)attempts 6–12goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. Keith – Gustafsson20:07

    xG 0.74–0.73 (50%)attempts 18–23goals 1–0

  2. Gustafsson – Forsling2:10

    xG 0.01–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 0–0

  3. Seabrook – Forsling11:56

    xG 0.23–0.34 (40%)attempts 7–10goals 0–0

Dallas Stars

Forward lines

  1. bestRadulov – Benn – Seguin8:56

    xG 0.60–0.32 (65%)attempts 18–5goals 1–0

  2. Comeau – Janmark – Dickinson8:37

    xG 0.47–0.31 (60%)attempts 8–9goals 0–1

  3. Radulov – Shore – Nichushkin2:18

    xG 0.15–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

  4. Hanzal – Pitlick – Faksa7:05

    xG 0.19–0.21 (47%)attempts 7–9goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestKlingberg – Lindell18:00

    xG 0.73–0.45 (62%)attempts 23–12goals 0–0

  2. Polak – Bayreuther11:43

    xG 0.50–0.27 (65%)attempts 11–7goals 1–1

  3. Fedun – Heiskanen13:50

    xG 0.61–0.50 (55%)attempts 15–11goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

DAL 2.7 xGCHI 3.7 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

DALCHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

DAL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line DAL is favoured, below it CHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 69/100 · #400 of 1271 this seasonSwing 1.03 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 46% (winner's lowest chance)
CHI 100%5050%50DAL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +17 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 69% of the time.

DAL winsCHI wins

Simulated goal difference (DAL − CHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).