Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Dec 22, 2018·Wells Fargo Center, Philadelphia

Columbus Blue Jackets 4, Philadelphia Flyers 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 88% of the time.

PHI winsCBJ wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CBJ1531004419
PHI17115115337

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 15:05CBJZach WerenskiAssists: Pierre-Luc Dubois, Artemi Panarin · Snap, 0.06 xG1–0
  2. P1 19:37PHISean CouturierPPAssists: Claude Giroux · Backhand, 0.08 xG1–1
  3. P2 7:40PHIPhil VaroneAssists: James van Riemsdyk, Dale Weise · Wrist, 0.34 xG1–2
  4. P2 9:30CBJCam AtkinsonAssists: Ryan Murray, Pierre-Luc Dubois · Wrist, 0.25 xG2–2
  5. P2 13:23CBJCam AtkinsonAssists: Scott Harrington, Artemi Panarin · Snap, 0.20 xG3–2
  6. P2 19:24CBJArtemi PanarinGWGAssists: Pierre-Luc Dubois · Snap, 0.09 xG4–2
  7. P3 18:50PHIJames van RiemsdykAssists: Jakub Voracek, Wayne Simmonds · Wrist, 0.30 xG4–3
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 12:06PHIRadko Gudas: Interference2 min
  2. P1 12:06PHIRadko Gudas: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 12:06CBJBrandon Dubinsky: Instigator2 min
  4. P1 12:06CBJBrandon Dubinsky: Fighting5 min
  5. P1 12:06CBJBrandon Dubinsky: Misconduct10 min
  6. P1 17:40CBJRyan Murray: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  7. P2 10:00PHISean Couturier: Interference2 min
  8. P2 17:20CBJBrandon Dubinsky: Roughing2 min
  9. P3 7:03PHIShayne Gostisbehere: Slashing2 min
  10. P3 10:41CBJPierre-Luc Dubois: Tripping2 min
  11. P3 15:55CBJBrandon Dubinsky: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CBJ00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PHI
46% to win54% to win
← CBJ attackPHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Dubois won the faceoff against Couturier
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CBJPHI
19Shots on goal37
1.7Expected goals4.4
30Shot attempts67
20Faceoffs won33
2Power plays4
25Penalty minutes11
22Hits24
17Blocked shots7
7Giveaways9
3Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Columbus Blue Jackets

Forward lines

  1. bestAtkinson – Panarin – Dubois12:41

    xG 0.88–0.22 (80%)attempts 12–7goals 4–0

  2. Dubinsky – Nash – Hannikainen4:24

    xG 0.26–0.05 (84%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

  3. Jenner – Anderson – Bjorkstrand9:25

    xG 0.05–0.22 (17%)attempts 5–10goals 0–0

  4. Foligno – Duclair – Wennberg10:45

    xG 0.12–1.11 (10%)attempts 4–14goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSavard – Harrington11:06

    xG 0.61–0.15 (80%)attempts 7–11goals 1–0

  2. Murray – Nutivaara16:39

    xG 0.35–0.86 (29%)attempts 6–17goals 1–1

  3. Jones – Werenski13:31

    xG 0.21–0.96 (18%)attempts 9–8goals 1–0

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestLaughton – Raffl – Patrick10:52

    xG 1.14–0.17 (87%)attempts 16–9goals 0–0

  2. Weise – Varone – Lindblom5:30

    xG 0.03–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

  3. Giroux – van Riemsdyk – Konecny11:00

    xG 0.22–0.30 (42%)attempts 9–3goals 0–0

  4. Voracek – Simmonds – Couturier13:48

    xG 0.24–0.74 (25%)attempts 8–10goals 0–3

Defence pairs

  1. bestGostisbehere – Hagg10:39

    xG 1.38–0.07 (95%)attempts 12–2goals 1–0

  2. Gostisbehere – Provorov2:54

    xG 0.03–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–0goals 0–0

  3. Sanheim – Provorov14:21

    xG 0.24–0.41 (37%)attempts 11–9goals 0–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PHI 4.4 xGCBJ 1.7 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PHICBJ

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PHI is favoured, below it CBJ. Dots are goals.

Excitement 58/100 · #522 of 1271 this seasonSwing 1.57 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 26% (winner's lowest chance)
CBJ 100%5050%50PHI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +23 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 88% of the time.

PHI winsCBJ wins

Simulated goal difference (PHI − CBJ), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).