Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Dec 23, 2018·PNC Arena, Raleigh

Boston Bruins 3, Carolina Hurricanes 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Carolina Hurricanes win this game 53% of the time.

CAR winsBOS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BOS21117012330
CAR11331618537

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 2:40BOSRyan DonatoPPAssists: Torey Krug, Brad Marchand · Deflected, 0.35 xG1–0
  2. P1 8:56BOSSteven KampferAssists: Sean Kuraly, Brad Marchand · Snap, 0.01 xG2–0
  3. P1 12:55CARTeuvo TeravainenAssists: Jaccob Slavin, Sebastian Aho · Wrist, 0.02 xG2–1
  4. P2 1:29CARSebastian AhoSHAssists: Teuvo Teravainen · Snap, 0.09 xG2–2
  5. P2 7:11CARSebastian AhoAssists: Teuvo Teravainen · Snap, 0.13 xG2–3
  6. P2 11:47CARJustin FaulkGWGAssists: Micheal Ferland, Justin Williams · Snap, 0.03 xG2–4
  7. P2 16:05BOSRyan DonatoAssists: Colby Cave, David Backes · Snap, 0.04 xG3–4
  8. P3 7:20CARTeuvo TeravainenSHAssists: Sebastian Aho · Snap, 0.19 xG3–5
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 1:27CARMicheal Ferland: High sticking2 min · PPG
  2. P1 5:35BOSSteven Kampfer: Holding2 min
  3. P1 6:39BOSNoel Acciari: High sticking2 min
  4. P1 10:09CARJustin Faulk: Interference2 min
  5. P1 19:44CARAndrei Svechnikov: High sticking2 min
  6. P3 5:44CARMicheal Ferland: Hooking2 min
  7. P3 14:27BOSRyan Donato: Too many men on the ice2 min
  8. P3 17:20CARAndrei Svechnikov: Boarding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BOS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CAR
46% to win54% to win
← BOS attackCAR attack →
  1. P1 20:00Bergeron won the faceoff against Wallmark
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BOSCAR
30Shots on goal37
3.7Expected goals3.9
60Shot attempts68
45Faceoffs won30
5Power plays3
6Penalty minutes10
41Hits32
16Blocked shots14
6Giveaways8
5Takeaways23

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Boston Bruins

Forward lines

  1. bestBergeron – Marchand – Heinen3:28

    xG 0.69–0.08 (89%)attempts 5–2goals 0–0

  2. Bergeron – Marchand – Pastrnak7:34

    xG 0.53–0.23 (70%)attempts 6–8goals 0–0

  3. Krejci – Nordstrom – Pastrnak3:41

    xG 0.15–0.09 (62%)attempts 2–6goals 0–0

  4. Backes – Cave – Donato8:10

    xG 0.29–0.30 (49%)attempts 10–8goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestKampfer – Krug4:18

    xG 0.76–0.07 (91%)attempts 7–2goals 2–1

  2. Krug – McAvoy5:48

    xG 0.32–0.22 (60%)attempts 6–5goals 0–0

  3. Grzelcyk – Carlo4:27

    xG 0.18–0.12 (60%)attempts 9–3goals 0–0

Carolina Hurricanes

Forward lines

  1. bestTeravainen – Aho – Svechnikov11:55

    xG 0.50–0.18 (74%)attempts 12–7goals 1–0

  2. Martinook – Foegele – Wallmark8:47

    xG 0.56–0.48 (54%)attempts 14–7goals 0–0

  3. Rask – McGinn – Kuokkanen7:26

    xG 0.11–0.29 (27%)attempts 7–9goals 0–0

  4. Williams – Ferland – Bishop7:47

    xG 0.21–0.73 (22%)attempts 7–8goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. Hamilton – van Riemsdyk11:40

    xG 0.42–0.48 (47%)attempts 15–9goals 0–0

  2. Slavin – Pesce15:07

    xG 0.31–0.48 (40%)attempts 12–12goals 1–1

  3. de Haan – Faulk14:25

    xG 0.72–0.95 (43%)attempts 14–15goals 2–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CAR 3.9 xGBOS 3.7 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CARBOS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CAR's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CAR is favoured, below it BOS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 78/100 · #287 of 1271 this seasonSwing 1.58 · 8 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 20% (winner's lowest chance)
BOS 100%5050%50CAR 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +22 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Carolina Hurricanes win this game 53% of the time.

CAR winsBOS wins

Simulated goal difference (CAR − BOS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).