Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Dec 29, 2018·Rogers Place, Edmonton

San Jose Sharks 7, Edmonton Oilers 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 72% of the time.

EDM winsSJS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
SJS212216312740
EDM1120737426

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 6:28EDMConnor McDavidAssists: Ty Rattie, Leon Draisaitl · Wrist, 0.17 xG0–1
  2. P1 6:44SJSJoonas DonskoiAssists: Erik Karlsson, Tomas Hertl · Snap, 0.09 xG1–1
  3. P1 10:13SJSTomas HertlAssists: Brent Burns, Erik Karlsson · Wrist, 0.22 xG2–1
  4. P2 6:39SJSLogan CoutureAssists: Joe Thornton, Joe Pavelski · Snap, 0.09 xG3–1
  5. P2 18:45SJSErik KarlssonAssists: Barclay Goodrow, Joonas Donskoi · Slap, 0.02 xG4–1
  6. P3 2:41SJSMelker KarlssonGWGAssists: Brent Burns, Kevin Labanc · Deflected, 0.11 xG5–1
  7. P3 8:25SJSLogan CoutureSHAssists: Evander Kane · Snap, 0.16 xG6–1
  8. P3 10:40EDMCaleb JonesAssists: Ty Rattie, Drake Caggiula · Snap, 0.10 xG6–2
  9. P3 14:09SJSMelker KarlssonAssists: Erik Karlsson, Barclay Goodrow · Snap, 0.18 xG7–2
  10. P3 16:53EDMLeon DraisaitlAssists: Milan Lucic, Matt Benning · Wrist, 0.08 xG7–3
  11. P3 19:54EDMConnor McDavidAssists: Chris Wideman, Ty Rattie · Deflected, 0.08 xG7–4
Penalties (4)
  1. P1 12:25EDMDrake Caggiula: Tripping2 min
  2. P2 9:05EDMChris Wideman: Holding2 min
  3. P2 14:30EDMChris Wideman: Tripping2 min
  4. P3 7:04SJSTimo Meier: High sticking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

SJS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0EDM
46% to win54% to win
← SJS attackEDM attack →
  1. P1 20:00McDavid won the faceoff against Couture
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

SJSEDM
40Shots on goal26
3.4Expected goals2.2
68Shot attempts40
28Faceoffs won37
3Power plays1
2Penalty minutes6
24Hits33
6Blocked shots10
12Giveaways10
7Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestKane – Donskoi – Hertl11:10

    xG 0.97–0.39 (71%)attempts 12–10goals 2–2

  2. Goodrow – Karlsson – Labanc7:27

    xG 0.44–0.20 (69%)attempts 8–5goals 2–1

  3. Couture – Meier – Radil11:45

    xG 0.40–0.37 (52%)attempts 13–6goals 0–0

  4. Thornton – Pavelski – Sorensen7:39

    xG 0.51–0.55 (48%)attempts 13–6goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestBurns – Simek12:15

    xG 0.86–0.07 (92%)attempts 16–5goals 1–0

  2. Karlsson – Dillon10:35

    xG 0.71–0.31 (70%)attempts 12–6goals 3–1

  3. Burns – Karlsson2:00

    xG 0.24–0.01 (95%)attempts 2–1goals 1–0

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. Rattie – McDavid – Caggiula4:40

    xG 0.19–0.23 (45%)attempts 2–6goals 2–1

  2. Lucic – Draisaitl – Yamamoto2:49

    xG 0.10–0.18 (35%)attempts 2–1goals 1–1

  3. Nugent-Hopkins – Khaira – Puljujarvi4:34

    xG 0.00–0.10 (0%)attempts 0–3goals 0–0

  4. Rattie – Draisaitl – McDavid8:09

    xG 0.71–0.82 (46%)attempts 9–15goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. Larsson – Nurse16:19

    xG 0.81–0.93 (47%)attempts 16–17goals 0–2

  2. Larsson – Jones2:56

    xG 0.04–0.24 (14%)attempts 1–3goals 0–1

  3. Gravel – Benning5:01

    xG 0.01–0.24 (5%)attempts 1–8goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

EDM 2.2 xGSJS 3.4 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

EDMSJS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

EDM's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line EDM is favoured, below it SJS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 76/100 · #322 of 1271 this seasonSwing 0.89 · 8 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 31% (winner's lowest chance)
SJS 100%5050%50EDM 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +18 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 72% of the time.

EDM winsSJS wins

Simulated goal difference (EDM − SJS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).