Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Dec 29, 2018·Enterprise Center, St. Louis

Pittsburgh Penguins 6, St. Louis Blues 1

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 54% of the time.

STL winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PIT11236212630
STL08112011131

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:48PITSidney CrosbyPPAssists: Patric Hornqvist, Phil Kessel · Wrist, 0.07 xG1–0
  2. P2 5:13PITJuuso RiikolaPPGWGAssists: Tanner Pearson, Derick Brassard · Slap, 0.09 xG2–0
  3. P2 7:17PITZachary Aston-ReeseAssists: Kris Letang, Sidney Crosby · Tip-in, 0.05 xG3–0
  4. P2 9:25PITPatric HornqvistPPAssists: Kris Letang, Phil Kessel · Deflected, 0.18 xG4–0
  5. P2 14:36STLDavid PerronAssists: Ryan O'Reilly, Alexander Steen · Wrist, 0.09 xG4–1
  6. P3 3:05PITJake GuentzelAssists: Brian Dumoulin, Sidney Crosby · Tip-in, 0.11 xG5–1
  7. P3 3:38PITEvgeni MalkinPPAssists: Phil Kessel, Kris Letang · Snap, 0.12 xG6–1
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 0:09STLAlexander Steen: High sticking2 min · PPG
  2. P1 13:11PITMarcus Pettersson: Holding2 min
  3. P2 3:24STLAlexander Steen: Interference2 min · PPG
  4. P2 9:18STLJay Bouwmeester: Hooking2 min · PPG
  5. P3 3:05STLJoel Edmundson: Roughing2 min · PPG
  6. P3 3:05PITZachary Aston-Reese: Fighting5 min
  7. P3 3:05STLJoel Edmundson: Fighting5 min
  8. P3 9:56PITEvgeni Malkin: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0STL
46% to win54% to win
← PIT attackSTL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Crosby won the faceoff against O'Reilly
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITSTL
30Shots on goal31
2.6Expected goals2.4
43Shot attempts74
31Faceoffs won30
4Power plays2
9Penalty minutes13
12Hits25
23Blocked shots5
7Giveaways9
14Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against. Shift data for this game is incomplete, so treat these as rough.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestCullen – Sheahan – Aston-Reese3:31

    xG 0.10–0.02 (84%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

  2. Crosby – Rust – Guentzel3:29

    xG 0.02–0.04 (32%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

  3. Crosby – Guentzel – Aston-Reese5:13

    xG 0.20–0.24 (46%)attempts 4–8goals 1–0

  4. Malkin – Hornqvist – Simon8:23

    xG 0.09–0.14 (40%)attempts 5–7goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Maatta – Riikola8:38

    xG 0.34–0.32 (52%)attempts 6–17goals 0–0

  2. Letang – Dumoulin11:04

    xG 0.35–0.42 (45%)attempts 7–12goals 1–1

  3. Johnson – Pettersson11:11

    xG 0.12–0.70 (15%)attempts 5–15goals 0–0

St. Louis Blues

Forward lines

  1. bestMaroon – Bozak – Thomas6:11

    xG 0.73–0.14 (84%)attempts 10–2goals 0–1

  2. Steen – Perron – O'Reilly9:28

    xG 0.36–0.08 (82%)attempts 13–4goals 1–0

  3. Schenn – Tarasenko – Schwartz9:22

    xG 0.35–0.29 (55%)attempts 12–6goals 0–0

  4. Nolan – Sundqvist – Barbashev6:27

    xG 0.08–0.28 (22%)attempts 7–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBortuzzo – Dunn9:18

    xG 0.70–0.24 (75%)attempts 18–4goals 0–0

  2. Edmundson – Parayko11:11

    xG 0.43–0.07 (87%)attempts 12–5goals 0–0

  3. Bouwmeester – Pietrangelo11:14

    xG 0.45–0.31 (59%)attempts 15–8goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

STL 2.4 xGPIT 2.6 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

STLPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

STL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line STL is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 13/100 · #1065 of 1271 this seasonSwing 0.65 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 46% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50STL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +17 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 54% of the time.

STL winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (STL − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).