Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Dec 31, 2018·Nationwide Arena, Columbus

Ottawa Senators 3, Columbus Blue Jackets 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Columbus Blue Jackets win this game 81% of the time.

CBJ winsOTT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
OTT0511327325
CBJ07114517638

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 8:15OTTRyan DzingelAssists: Chris Tierney, Bobby Ryan · Wrist, 0.09 xG1–0
  2. P2 9:36CBJZach WerenskiAssists: Artemi Panarin, Pierre-Luc Dubois · Snap, 0.13 xG1–1
  3. P3 3:59CBJPierre-Luc DuboisAssists: Cam Atkinson, Seth Jones · Backhand, 0.08 xG1–2
  4. P3 11:15CBJPierre-Luc DuboisUnassisted · Wrist, 0.10 xG1–3
  5. P3 11:36OTTBobby RyanAssists: Mark Borowiecki, Mikkel Boedker · Deflected, 0.11 xG2–3
  6. P3 13:34OTTRyan DzingelAssists: Matt Duchene, Dylan DeMelo · Wrist, 0.12 xG3–3
  7. P3 17:59CBJZach WerenskiGWGAssists: Cam Atkinson, Pierre-Luc Dubois · Tip-in, 0.11 xG3–4
  8. P3 19:00CBJCam AtkinsonENAssists: Artemi Panarin, Ryan Murray · Wrist, 0.77 xG3–5
  9. P3 19:34CBJJosh AndersonENUnassisted · Slap, 0.44 xG3–6
Penalties (9)
  1. P2 6:10OTTMark Borowiecki: Fighting5 min
  2. P2 6:10CBJJosh Anderson: Cross checking2 min
  3. P2 6:10CBJJosh Anderson: Fighting5 min
  4. P2 10:32CBJMarkus Hannikainen: Holding the stick2 min
  5. P2 15:53OTTBen Harpur: Holding2 min
  6. P2 17:08CBJArtemi Panarin: Hooking2 min
  7. P3 1:14OTTMark Borowiecki: Tripping2 min
  8. P3 5:19CBJLukas Sedlak: Roughing2 min
  9. P3 5:19OTTBrady Tkachuk: Roughing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

OTT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CBJ
46% to win54% to win
← OTT attackCBJ attack →
  1. P1 20:00White won the faceoff against Dubois
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

OTTCBJ
25Shots on goal38
2.8Expected goals5.0
47Shot attempts69
36Faceoffs won40
3Power plays2
11Penalty minutes13
13Hits23
14Blocked shots11
3Giveaways10
7Takeaways10

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Ottawa Senators

Forward lines

  1. bestStone – Tierney – Tkachuk13:08

    xG 0.85–0.60 (59%)attempts 13–16goals 0–0

  2. Ryan – Smith – Boedker2:25

    xG 0.14–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 1–0

  3. Smith – Dzingel – Rodewald5:03

    xG 0.50–0.39 (56%)attempts 4–9goals 0–0

  4. Duchene – Dzingel – White3:12

    xG 0.13–0.08 (61%)attempts 4–1goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestHarpur – Wolanin4:11

    xG 0.18–0.07 (70%)attempts 2–6goals 0–0

  2. Borowiecki – DeMelo9:42

    xG 0.44–0.45 (49%)attempts 9–11goals 1–0

  3. DeMelo – Harpur3:19

    xG 0.21–0.23 (48%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0

Columbus Blue Jackets

Forward lines

  1. bestAtkinson – Panarin – Dubois15:06

    xG 1.53–0.62 (71%)attempts 22–11goals 4–0

  2. Dubinsky – Nash – Sedlak6:51

    xG 0.28–0.17 (62%)attempts 4–5goals 0–0

  3. Anderson – Duclair – Wennberg10:45

    xG 0.37–0.49 (43%)attempts 9–9goals 0–1

  4. Jenner – Bjorkstrand – Hannikainen7:16

    xG 0.45–0.63 (42%)attempts 9–8goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestSavard – Harrington13:49

    xG 1.08–0.42 (72%)attempts 15–10goals 1–1

  2. Jones – Werenski16:05

    xG 1.23–0.91 (57%)attempts 23–13goals 2–1

  3. Murray – Nutivaara13:42

    xG 0.65–0.52 (56%)attempts 14–10goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CBJ 5.0 xGOTT 2.8 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CBJOTT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CBJ's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CBJ is favoured, below it OTT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 94/100 · #88 of 1271 this seasonSwing 2.22 · 9 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 29% (winner's lowest chance)
OTT 100%5050%50CBJ 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +47 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Columbus Blue Jackets win this game 81% of the time.

CBJ winsOTT wins

Simulated goal difference (CBJ − OTT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).