Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Jan 9, 2019·Scotiabank Saddledome, Calgary

Colorado Avalanche 3, Calgary Flames 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 67% of the time.

CGY winsCOL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
COL211010114335
CGY251625516

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 5:34CGYMikael BacklundAssists: James Neal, Johnny Gaudreau · Wrist, 0.29 xG0–1
  2. P1 10:29CGYMark JankowskiAssists: Sam Bennett, Mark Giordano · Wrist, 0.05 xG0–2
  3. P1 16:32COLNathan MacKinnonAssists: Gabriel Landeskog, Mikko Rantanen · Slap, 0.07 xG1–2
  4. P1 19:41COLErik JohnsonAssists: Matt Calvert, Tyson Jost · Wrist, 0.07 xG2–2
  5. P2 12:57CGYElias LindholmPPAssists: Mark Giordano, Johnny Gaudreau · Wrist, 0.04 xG2–3
  6. P3 9:14CGYMichael FrolikGWGAssists: Mark Giordano, TJ Brodie · Deflected, 0.07 xG2–4
  7. P3 19:22COLMikko RantanenAssists: Gabriel Landeskog · Wrist, 0.04 xG3–4
  8. P3 19:50CGYMatthew TkachukENAssists: TJ Brodie, Derek Ryan · Wrist, 0.71 xG3–5
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 2:11CGYSean Monahan: Boarding2 min
  2. P1 17:07CGYMark Giordano: Tripping2 min
  3. P2 2:43COLSheldon Dries: Holding2 min
  4. P2 7:38CGYTJ Brodie: Hooking2 min
  5. P2 12:47COLTyson Barrie: Hooking2 min · PPG
  6. P3 16:00CGYJohnny Gaudreau: High sticking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

COL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CGY
46% to win54% to win
← COL attackCGY attack →
  1. P1 20:00Soderberg won the faceoff against Jankowski
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

COLCGY
35Shots on goal16
3.7Expected goals2.7
79Shot attempts42
27Faceoffs won22
4Power plays2
4Penalty minutes8
18Hits10
11Blocked shots22
13Giveaways17
8Takeaways14

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestLandeskog – MacKinnon – Rantanen15:27

    xG 1.52–0.30 (83%)attempts 22–11goals 1–0

  2. Kerfoot – Compher – Jost6:05

    xG 0.16–0.00 (100%)attempts 7–1goals 0–0

  3. Andrighetto – Dries – O'Connor3:06

    xG 0.06–0.03 (65%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

  4. Soderberg – Calvert – Nieto7:51

    xG 0.13–0.13 (49%)attempts 8–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestCole – Barrie12:35

    xG 0.79–0.28 (74%)attempts 22–7goals 1–0

  2. Johnson – Girard9:53

    xG 0.52–0.25 (67%)attempts 9–9goals 0–1

  3. Nemeth – Graves3:34

    xG 0.12–0.00 (100%)attempts 6–0goals 0–0

Calgary Flames

Forward lines

  1. bestHathaway – Czarnik – Ryan5:39

    xG 0.13–0.06 (69%)attempts 2–6goals 0–0

  2. Neal – Jankowski – Bennett7:43

    xG 0.17–0.25 (41%)attempts 5–11goals 0–0

  3. Frolik – Backlund – Tkachuk13:52

    xG 0.37–0.66 (36%)attempts 14–11goals 1–0

  4. Gaudreau – Lindholm – Monahan12:32

    xG 0.11–0.60 (15%)attempts 5–14goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestProut – Andersson8:00

    xG 0.52–0.15 (78%)attempts 5–9goals 1–0

  2. Giordano – Brodie18:05

    xG 0.78–0.81 (49%)attempts 20–14goals 2–0

  3. Hamonic – Hanifin16:22

    xG 0.27–1.07 (20%)attempts 9–23goals 0–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CGY 2.7 xGCOL 3.7 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CGYCOL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CGY's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CGY is favoured, below it COL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 77/100 · #305 of 1271 this seasonSwing 1.31 · 8 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 50% (winner's lowest chance)
COL 100%5050%50CGY 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +24 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 67% of the time.

CGY winsCOL wins

Simulated goal difference (CGY − COL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).