Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Jan 11, 2019·PNC Arena, Raleigh

Buffalo Sabres 3, Carolina Hurricanes 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Carolina Hurricanes win this game 53% of the time.

CAR winsBUF wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BUF11218113333
CAR19311010430

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 10:25CARMicheal FerlandAssists: Teuvo Teravainen, Jaccob Slavin · Wrist, 0.01 xG0–1
  2. P1 19:39BUFJeff SkinnerPPAssists: Rasmus Dahlin, Sam Reinhart · Deflected, 0.34 xG1–1
  3. P2 4:30CARJustin WilliamsAssists: Trevor van Riemsdyk · Wrist, 0.11 xG1–2
  4. P2 5:00BUFJason PominvilleAssists: Evan Rodrigues, Rasmus Dahlin · Slap, 0.10 xG2–2
  5. P2 5:42CARSebastian AhoAssists: Micheal Ferland · Deflected, 0.04 xG2–3
  6. P2 12:27CARSebastian AhoGWGAssists: Micheal Ferland, Teuvo Teravainen · Deflected, 0.10 xG2–4
  7. P3 16:48BUFKyle OkposoAssists: Zemgus Girgensons, Marco Scandella · Deflected, 0.09 xG3–4
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 12:09BUFRasmus Ristolainen: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  2. P1 19:31CARSaku Maenalanen: Tripping2 min · PPG
  3. P2 1:51CARAndrei Svechnikov: Hooking2 min
  4. P2 16:41BUFJohan Larsson: Roughing2 min
  5. P2 16:41CARJustin Faulk: Roughing2 min
  6. P2 16:41CARJustin Faulk: Roughing2 min
  7. P2 19:25BUFKyle Okposo: Holding2 min
  8. P3 7:34CARJordan Martinook: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BUF00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CAR
46% to win54% to win
← BUF attackCAR attack →
  1. P1 20:00Eichel won the faceoff against Aho
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BUFCAR
33Shots on goal30
3.1Expected goals3.4
61Shot attempts54
30Faceoffs won32
4Power plays2
6Penalty minutes10
18Hits38
11Blocked shots11
7Giveaways17
6Takeaways16

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestPominville – Sheary – Rodrigues3:52

    xG 0.51–0.15 (78%)attempts 8–2goals 0–0

  2. Skinner – Reinhart – Eichel5:19

    xG 0.18–0.12 (59%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0

  3. Okposo – Larsson – Rodrigues6:59

    xG 0.38–0.34 (53%)attempts 8–11goals 0–0

  4. Sobotka – Sheary – Reinhart7:30

    xG 0.20–0.18 (53%)attempts 9–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestScandella – McCabe9:43

    xG 0.35–0.16 (68%)attempts 13–6goals 0–1

  2. Ristolainen – Pilut14:30

    xG 0.70–0.53 (57%)attempts 17–13goals 0–0

  3. Ristolainen – Dahlin2:53

    xG 0.05–0.18 (20%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

Carolina Hurricanes

Forward lines

  1. bestFerland – Teravainen – Aho12:34

    xG 0.99–0.12 (89%)attempts 16–7goals 3–0

  2. Williams – McKegg – McGinn11:46

    xG 0.65–0.57 (53%)attempts 12–12goals 0–0

  3. Rask – Maenalanen – Foegele6:58

    xG 0.34–0.40 (46%)attempts 6–12goals 0–2

  4. Martinook – Wallmark – Svechnikov8:07

    xG 0.28–0.67 (30%)attempts 9–12goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSlavin – Pesce16:17

    xG 1.33–0.38 (78%)attempts 12–17goals 2–0

  2. Hamilton – van Riemsdyk11:19

    xG 0.66–0.68 (49%)attempts 18–11goals 1–1

  3. de Haan – Faulk16:18

    xG 0.57–0.95 (37%)attempts 16–20goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CAR 3.4 xGBUF 3.1 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CARBUF

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CAR's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CAR is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.

Excitement 57/100 · #536 of 1271 this seasonSwing 1.49 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 51% (winner's lowest chance)
BUF 100%5050%50CAR 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +21 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Carolina Hurricanes win this game 53% of the time.

CAR winsBUF wins

Simulated goal difference (CAR − BUF), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).