Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Jan 12, 2019·STAPLES Center, Los Angeles

Pittsburgh Penguins 2, Los Angeles Kings 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 66% of the time.

LAK winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PIT19010121240
LAK1721325525

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 5:30PITJake GuentzelSHAssists: Sidney Crosby, Jack Johnson · Backhand, 0.10 xG1–0
  2. P1 10:58LAKJeff CarterUnassisted · Slap, 0.06 xG1–1
  3. P2 8:47LAKAlex IafalloAssists: Jeff Carter, Jake Muzzin · Deflected, 0.13 xG1–2
  4. P2 16:05LAKAnze KopitarSHGWGAssists: Jeff Carter · Snap, 0.19 xG1–3
  5. P3 0:49LAKBrendan LeipsicAssists: Ilya Kovalchuk, Jake Muzzin · Tip-in, 0.12 xG1–4
  6. P3 9:20PITJake GuentzelPPAssists: Phil Kessel, Evgeni Malkin · Wrist, 0.21 xG2–4
  7. P3 19:13LAKAnze KopitarENAssists: Dustin Brown · Wrist, 0.70 xG2–5
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 4:17PITEvgeni Malkin: Slashing2 min
  2. P1 16:26PITDerek Grant: High sticking2 min
  3. P2 11:13PITMarcus Pettersson: Fighting5 min
  4. P2 11:13LAKMatt Luff: Fighting5 min
  5. P2 14:41LAKDrew Doughty: Interference2 min
  6. P3 0:49PITTanner Pearson: Delaying game bench2 min
  7. P3 4:33LAKBrendan Leipsic: High sticking2 min
  8. P3 8:58LAKAnze Kopitar: Delaying game puck over glass2 min · PPG
  9. P3 11:45LAKBrendan Leipsic: Interference2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0LAK
46% to win54% to win
← PIT attackLAK attack →
  1. P1 20:00Crosby won the faceoff against Kopitar
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITLAK
40Shots on goal25
4.5Expected goals3.5
78Shot attempts46
22Faceoffs won29
4Power plays3
11Penalty minutes13
20Hits17
10Blocked shots17
6Giveaways14
4Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestMalkin – Pearson – Simon10:44

    xG 0.55–0.02 (97%)attempts 14–3goals 0–0

  2. Crosby – Rust – Guentzel13:55

    xG 1.14–0.63 (65%)attempts 21–9goals 0–0

  3. Brassard – Kessel – Sheahan7:26

    xG 0.62–0.42 (60%)attempts 7–8goals 0–1

  4. Cullen – Grant – Wilson4:12

    xG 0.07–0.65 (10%)attempts 3–7goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestJohnson – Pettersson11:23

    xG 1.82–0.76 (71%)attempts 27–8goals 0–2

  2. Letang – Dumoulin15:48

    xG 0.78–0.53 (60%)attempts 17–7goals 0–1

  3. Maatta – Pettersson2:00

    xG 0.10–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

Los Angeles Kings

Forward lines

  1. bestHagelin – Toffoli – Kempe7:25

    xG 0.98–0.26 (79%)attempts 14–5goals 0–0

  2. Thompson – Clifford – Luff4:17

    xG 0.60–0.21 (74%)attempts 6–2goals 0–0

  3. Carter – Leipsic – Iafallo6:06

    xG 0.32–0.25 (56%)attempts 5–6goals 2–0

  4. Carter – Thompson – Iafallo2:18

    xG 0.00–0.15 (0%)attempts 0–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMuzzin – Martinez13:01

    xG 1.22–0.83 (60%)attempts 17–15goals 2–0

  2. Phaneuf – Fantenberg12:06

    xG 0.41–0.50 (45%)attempts 10–12goals 0–0

  3. Doughty – Forbort19:01

    xG 0.56–1.41 (28%)attempts 7–27goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

LAK 3.5 xGPIT 4.5 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

LAKPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

LAK's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line LAK is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 52/100 · #610 of 1271 this seasonSwing 1.04 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 35% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50LAK 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +22 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 66% of the time.

LAK winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (LAK − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).