Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Jan 19, 2019·Rogers Place, Edmonton

Calgary Flames 5, Edmonton Oilers 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 84% of the time.

EDM winsCGY wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CGY014310210534
EDM0611018224

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 0:44CGYJohnny GaudreauAssists: Elias Lindholm, Mark Giordano · Wrist, 0.06 xG1–0
  2. P2 7:29CGYMark GiordanoPPAssists: Sean Monahan, Noah Hanifin · Wrist, 0.40 xG2–0
  3. P2 15:30CGYOliver KylingtonGWGAssists: Mikael Backlund, Michael Frolik · Snap, 0.06 xG3–0
  4. P2 19:42EDMRyan Nugent-HopkinsAssists: Jesse Puljujarvi · Wrist, 0.13 xG3–1
  5. P3 4:16EDMMilan LucicPPAssists: Jesse Puljujarvi, Caleb Jones · Tip-in, 0.01 xG3–2
  6. P3 14:15CGYMikael BacklundUnassisted · Wrist, 0.10 xG4–2
  7. P3 16:03CGYSean MonahanPPAssists: Matthew Tkachuk, Mark Giordano · Wrist, 0.42 xG5–2
Penalties (18)
  1. P1 13:17EDMZack Kassian: Boarding2 min
  2. P1 15:18CGYMark Giordano: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  3. P1 17:00EDMJesse Puljujarvi: Too many men on the ice2 min
  4. P2 3:11CGYMark Giordano: High sticking double minor4 min
  5. P2 5:31EDMMilan Lucic: Roughing2 min · PPG
  6. P2 5:31CGYGarnet Hathaway: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  7. P2 6:23EDMDarnell Nurse: Holding2 min
  8. P2 8:56EDMDarnell Nurse: Roughing2 min
  9. P2 8:56CGYMichael Frolik: Interference2 min
  10. P2 12:41CGYJohnny Gaudreau: Cross checking2 min
  11. P2 16:35EDMKris Russell: High sticking2 min
  12. P2 19:23CGYMikael Backlund: Cross checking2 min
  13. P2 19:23EDMLeon Draisaitl: Embellishment2 min
  14. P3 2:27CGYTJ Brodie: Tripping2 min · PPG
  15. P3 4:57EDMMilan Lucic: Cross checking2 min
  16. P3 6:19CGYJames Neal: Slashing2 min
  17. P3 8:21EDMJesse Puljujarvi: Interference2 min
  18. P3 14:50EDMBrandon Manning: Interference2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CGY00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0EDM
46% to win54% to win
← CGY attackEDM attack →
  1. P1 20:00Lindholm won the faceoff against McDavid
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CGYEDM
34Shots on goal24
4.7Expected goals2.3
55Shot attempts52
34Faceoffs won27
7Power plays6
18Penalty minutes20
9Hits19
15Blocked shots14
12Giveaways24
10Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Calgary Flames

Forward lines

  1. bestJankowski – Bennett – Tkachuk4:58

    xG 0.19–0.05 (78%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0

  2. Hathaway – Mangiapane – Ryan3:18

    xG 0.01–0.00 (94%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

  3. Neal – Frolik – Backlund8:59

    xG 0.18–0.30 (37%)attempts 5–9goals 2–0

  4. Gaudreau – Lindholm – Monahan8:44

    xG 0.17–0.53 (25%)attempts 7–10goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestAndersson – Kylington6:51

    xG 0.15–0.05 (76%)attempts 6–5goals 1–0

  2. Hamonic – Hanifin13:50

    xG 0.29–0.49 (37%)attempts 9–14goals 2–0

  3. Giordano – Brodie9:03

    xG 0.18–0.54 (25%)attempts 9–11goals 0–0

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. bestLucic – Cave – Puljujarvi3:10

    xG 0.17–0.02 (88%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

  2. Brodziak – Kassian – Rieder3:46

    xG 0.15–0.01 (92%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

  3. Chiasson – Draisaitl – McDavid8:19

    xG 0.45–0.34 (57%)attempts 9–9goals 0–1

  4. Nugent-Hopkins – Khaira – Yamamoto5:27

    xG 0.00–0.10 (0%)attempts 2–2goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestRussell – Nurse11:50

    xG 0.60–0.05 (92%)attempts 14–5goals 0–0

  2. Manning – Benning8:21

    xG 0.29–0.20 (59%)attempts 6–10goals 0–0

  3. Larsson – Jones7:57

    xG 0.07–0.31 (19%)attempts 4–6goals 0–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

EDM 2.3 xGCGY 4.7 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

EDMCGY

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

EDM's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line EDM is favoured, below it CGY. Dots are goals.

Excitement 69/100 · #395 of 1271 this seasonSwing 1.19 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 46% (winner's lowest chance)
CGY 100%5050%50EDM 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 84% of the time.

EDM winsCGY wins

Simulated goal difference (EDM − CGY), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).