Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Jan 20, 2019·Rogers Place, Edmonton

Carolina Hurricanes 7, Edmonton Oilers 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Carolina Hurricanes win this game 82% of the time.

EDM winsCAR wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CAR3193916734
EDM1101625421

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:28CARNino NiederreiterAssists: Sebastian Aho, Jaccob Slavin · Snap, 0.09 xG1–0
  2. P1 6:35CARAndrei SvechnikovAssists: Jaccob Slavin, Lucas Wallmark · Tip-in, 0.22 xG2–0
  3. P1 11:02CARNino NiederreiterAssists: Brett Pesce, Sebastian Aho · Wrist, 0.14 xG3–0
  4. P1 19:09EDMBrandon ManningAssists: Connor McDavid, Ryan Nugent-Hopkins · Snap, 0.34 xG3–1
  5. P2 1:50CARBrock McGinnAssists: Andrei Svechnikov · Slap, 0.23 xG4–1
  6. P2 4:07CARLucas WallmarkPPGWGAssists: Andrei Svechnikov, Jaccob Slavin · Wrist, 0.25 xG5–1
  7. P2 18:29CARJordan MartinookAssists: Warren Foegele, Teuvo Teravainen · Tip-in, 0.14 xG6–1
  8. P2 19:41EDMLeon DraisaitlAssists: Jujhar Khaira · Snap, 0.16 xG6–2
  9. P3 0:14EDMZack KassianAssists: Matt Benning, Leon Draisaitl · Tip-in, 0.12 xG6–3
  10. P3 7:07EDMLeon DraisaitlPPAssists: Connor McDavid, Alex Chiasson · Snap, 0.19 xG6–4
  11. P3 17:38CARLucas WallmarkENAssists: Sebastian Aho · Wrist, 0.76 xG7–4
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 12:17CARJordan Martinook: Roughing2 min
  2. P1 12:17EDMBrandon Manning: Roughing2 min
  3. P1 14:32CARLucas Wallmark: Hooking2 min
  4. P1 16:00CARSaku Maenalanen: Cross checking2 min
  5. P2 3:24EDMAlex Chiasson: Tripping2 min · PPG
  6. P3 3:36CARNino Niederreiter: High sticking2 min
  7. P3 6:19CARNino Niederreiter: Delaying game puck over glass2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CAR00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0EDM
46% to win54% to win
← CAR attackEDM attack →
  1. P1 20:00Aho won the faceoff against Draisaitl
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CAREDM
34Shots on goal21
5.1Expected goals2.8
56Shot attempts48
30Faceoffs won25
1Power plays4
10Penalty minutes4
30Hits32
16Blocked shots12
17Giveaways23
7Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Carolina Hurricanes

Forward lines

  1. bestWilliams – Niederreiter – Aho10:21

    xG 1.39–0.80 (64%)attempts 11–8goals 2–2

  2. McKegg – Maenalanen – Foegele10:19

    xG 0.70–0.22 (76%)attempts 9–9goals 0–0

  3. McGinn – Wallmark – Svechnikov8:59

    xG 0.64–0.24 (72%)attempts 7–6goals 1–0

  4. Teravainen – Martinook – Aho3:46

    xG 0.28–0.07 (80%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestFaulk – Pesce14:45

    xG 2.02–0.65 (76%)attempts 20–9goals 2–1

  2. de Haan – van Riemsdyk10:21

    xG 0.42–0.17 (71%)attempts 8–5goals 0–0

  3. Hamilton – Slavin12:38

    xG 1.07–0.94 (53%)attempts 16–17goals 2–2

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. bestKassian – Khaira – Draisaitl3:22

    xG 0.12–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–1goals 1–0

  2. Lucic – Cave – Puljujarvi4:31

    xG 0.11–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 0–0

  3. Brodziak – Kassian – Rieder6:14

    xG 0.32–0.26 (54%)attempts 7–6goals 0–0

  4. Lucic – Cave – Yamamoto2:21

    xG 0.03–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestManning – Larsson6:40

    xG 0.82–0.16 (84%)attempts 9–3goals 1–1

  2. Benning – Nurse2:31

    xG 0.27–0.08 (76%)attempts 3–3goals 1–0

  3. Russell – Larsson2:22

    xG 0.07–0.02 (75%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

EDM 2.8 xGCAR 5.1 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

EDMCAR

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

EDM's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line EDM is favoured, below it CAR. Dots are goals.

Excitement 90/100 · #127 of 1271 this seasonSwing 0.87 · 9 goals in reach · 3-goal lead cutComeback index 46% (winner's lowest chance)
CAR 100%5050%50EDM 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +17 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Carolina Hurricanes win this game 82% of the time.

EDM winsCAR wins

Simulated goal difference (EDM − CAR), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).