Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Feb 2, 2019·Nationwide Arena, Columbus

St. Louis Blues 4, Columbus Blue Jackets 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 85% of the time.

CBJ winsSTL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
STL28011214433
CBJ050827220

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 8:28STLRyan O'ReillyAssists: Alex Pietrangelo, Vladimir Tarasenko · Backhand, 0.13 xG1–0
  2. P1 19:15STLCarl GunnarssonAssists: Brayden Schenn, Vladimir Tarasenko · Tip-in, 0.12 xG2–0
  3. P3 6:15CBJOliver BjorkstrandAssists: Artemi Panarin · Snap, 0.09 xG2–1
  4. P3 6:49STLVladimir TarasenkoGWGAssists: Ryan O'Reilly, Brayden Schenn · Backhand, 0.29 xG3–1
  5. P3 17:23CBJPierre-Luc DuboisAssists: Artemi Panarin, Cam Atkinson · Snap, 0.10 xG3–2
  6. P3 19:30STLOskar SundqvistENAssists: Brayden Schenn · Backhand, 0.76 xG4–2
Penalties (3)
  1. P2 3:36STLVince Dunn: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  2. P2 7:58CBJJosh Anderson: Tripping2 min
  3. P3 2:43CBJScott Harrington: Cross checking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

STL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CBJ
46% to win54% to win
← STL attackCBJ attack →
  1. P1 20:00O'Reilly won the faceoff against Dubois
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

STLCBJ
33Shots on goal20
3.5Expected goals1.5
55Shot attempts43
32Faceoffs won26
2Power plays1
2Penalty minutes4
14Hits29
12Blocked shots16
3Giveaways9
7Takeaways15

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

St. Louis Blues

Forward lines

  1. bestO'Reilly – Schenn – Tarasenko11:34

    xG 0.86–0.39 (69%)attempts 11–10goals 3–0

  2. Bozak – Schwartz – Thomas3:56

    xG 0.20–0.00 (100%)attempts 6–0goals 0–0

  3. Maroon – Sundqvist – Sanford8:29

    xG 0.38–0.26 (60%)attempts 10–5goals 0–0

  4. Steen – Bozak – Schwartz10:01

    xG 0.20–0.08 (71%)attempts 5–10goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestGunnarsson – Pietrangelo15:46

    xG 1.22–0.73 (63%)attempts 19–15goals 2–1

  2. Bouwmeester – Parayko19:10

    xG 0.63–0.15 (81%)attempts 11–12goals 1–0

  3. Edmundson – Dunn11:26

    xG 0.27–0.18 (61%)attempts 11–5goals 0–0

Columbus Blue Jackets

Forward lines

  1. bestBjorkstrand – Panarin – Dubois3:23

    xG 0.27–0.19 (59%)attempts 3–3goals 1–0

  2. Foligno – Bjorkstrand – Wennberg2:57

    xG 0.07–0.02 (74%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

  3. Foligno – Atkinson – Wennberg3:10

    xG 0.02–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  4. Anderson – Panarin – Dubois6:00

    xG 0.19–0.23 (45%)attempts 7–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMurray – Nutivaara4:17

    xG 0.34–0.08 (81%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

  2. Harrington – Nutivaara9:39

    xG 0.18–0.23 (45%)attempts 4–6goals 0–0

  3. Savard – Werenski8:10

    xG 0.12–0.17 (42%)attempts 11–6goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CBJ 1.5 xGSTL 3.5 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CBJSTL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CBJ's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CBJ is favoured, below it STL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 42/100 · #727 of 1271 this seasonSwing 0.99 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 46% (winner's lowest chance)
STL 100%5050%50CBJ 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +18 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 85% of the time.

CBJ winsSTL wins

Simulated goal difference (CBJ − STL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).