Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Feb 2, 2019·Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul

Chicago Blackhawks 4, Minnesota Wild 3 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 66% of the time.

MIN winsCHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
CHI082141712431
MIN1801121200331

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 8:22MINJason ZuckerPPAssists: Mikael Granlund, Ryan Suter · Wrist, 0.12 xG0–1
  2. P2 7:51CHIAlex DeBrincatAssists: Dominik Kahun, Dylan Strome · Wrist, 0.04 xG1–1
  3. P2 14:47CHIErik GustafssonAssists: Dominik Kahun, Dylan Strome · Slap, 0.02 xG2–1
  4. P3 8:11MINMikko KoivuAssists: Zach Parise, Jared Spurgeon · Snap, 0.06 xG2–2
  5. P3 15:25CHIJonathan ToewsPPAssists: Patrick Kane, Alex DeBrincat · Tip-in, 0.12 xG3–2
  6. P3 16:58MINVictor RaskAssists: Jordan Greenway, Marcus Foligno · Wrist, 0.08 xG3–3
  7. OT 1:19CHIErik GustafssonPPGWGAssists: Alex DeBrincat, Jonathan Toews · Slap, 0.14 xG4–3
Penalties (12)
  1. P1 0:21MINJared Spurgeon: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 7:37CHIConnor Murphy: Tripping2 min · PPG
  3. P1 10:31CHIBrent Seabrook: Tripping2 min
  4. P1 14:51MINBrad Hunt: Penalty shot hooking on breakaway0 min
  5. P1 18:20MINEric Staal: Tripping2 min
  6. P2 3:27CHIJohn Hayden: Fighting5 min
  7. P2 3:27MINMatt Hendricks: Fighting5 min
  8. P2 14:47MINJordan Greenway: Delaying game bench2 min
  9. P2 18:52CHIDuncan Keith: Tripping2 min
  10. P3 2:19CHIAlex DeBrincat: Hooking2 min
  11. P3 14:32MINGreg Pateryn: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  12. P3 19:41MINRyan Suter: Delaying game puck over glass2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MIN
46% to win54% to win
← CHI attackMIN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Toews won the faceoff against Koivu
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CHIMIN
31Shots on goal31
3.1Expected goals2.2
49Shot attempts56
28Faceoffs won32
5Power plays4
13Penalty minutes15
14Hits16
14Blocked shots8
7Giveaways9
5Takeaways10

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestKruger – Saad – Kampf9:05

    xG 0.30–0.08 (79%)attempts 8–5goals 0–0

  2. Anisimov – Hayden – Perlini5:22

    xG 0.03–0.02 (61%)attempts 1–4goals 0–0

  3. Toews – Kane – Caggiula12:01

    xG 0.43–0.43 (50%)attempts 7–16goals 0–0

  4. Strome – DeBrincat – Kahun10:09

    xG 0.19–0.65 (22%)attempts 10–8goals 2–1

Defence pairs

  1. Seabrook – Forsling2:59

    xG 0.15–0.13 (54%)attempts 3–3goals 0–1

  2. Keith – Gustafsson3:44

    xG 0.02–0.07 (24%)attempts 3–1goals 1–0

  3. Gustafsson – Forsling10:08

    xG 0.45–0.53 (46%)attempts 13–11goals 0–0

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestFoligno – Rask – Greenway8:25

    xG 0.51–0.12 (81%)attempts 11–5goals 1–1

  2. Staal – Zucker – Granlund13:42

    xG 0.53–0.16 (77%)attempts 7–6goals 0–0

  3. Fehr – Foligno – Greenway2:35

    xG 0.00–0.00attempts 0–3goals 0–0

  4. Koivu – Parise – Coyle13:29

    xG 0.52–0.55 (49%)attempts 18–10goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSuter – Spurgeon20:03

    xG 0.99–0.59 (63%)attempts 20–16goals 2–1

  2. Seeler – Hunt6:36

    xG 0.32–0.09 (78%)attempts 8–5goals 0–1

  3. Pateryn – Brodin16:00

    xG 0.50–0.37 (58%)attempts 14–9goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MIN 2.2 xGCHI 3.1 xG
0123P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MINCHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it CHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 91/100 · #119 of 1271 this seasonSwing 2.51 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 27% (winner's lowest chance)
CHI 100%5050%50MIN 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +40 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 66% of the time.

MIN winsCHI wins

Simulated goal difference (MIN − CHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).