Tue, Feb 5, 2019·Centre Bell, Montreal
Anaheim Ducks 1, Montréal Canadiens 4
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Montréal Canadiens win this game 79% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ANA | 07 | 19 | 09 | 125 |
| MTL | 311 | 015 | 16 | 432 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P1 7:11MTLBrendan GallagherAssists: Jonathan Drouin · Wrist, 0.10 xG0–1
- P1 9:36MTLJesperi KotkaniemiGWGAssists: Joel Armia, Mike Reilly · Wrist, 0.18 xG0–2
- P1 16:39MTLBrendan GallagherAssists: Jonathan Drouin, Shea Weber · Snap, 0.11 xG0–3
- P2 11:27ANARyan GetzlafAssists: Corey Perry, Devin Shore · Wrap-around, 0.14 xG1–3
- P3 2:31MTLPhillip DanaultAssists: Jonathan Drouin, Brendan Gallagher · Backhand, 0.11 xG1–4
Penalties (4)
- P1 19:05ANABrian Gibbons: Tripping2 min
- P2 8:29ANAHampus Lindholm: Slashing2 min
- P2 12:01MTLBrett Kulak: High sticking2 min
- P3 10:00ANABrandon Montour: High sticking2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Kesler won the faceoff against Kotkaniemi
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Anaheim Ducks
Forward lines
- bestHenrique – Ritchie – Sprong11:06
xG 0.31–0.17 (64%)attempts 14–6goals 0–0
- Cracknell – Gibbons – Rowney6:59
xG 0.25–0.35 (42%)attempts 6–5goals 0–0
- Kesler – Silfverberg – Shore9:47
xG 0.03–0.59 (5%)attempts 7–11goals 0–1
- Getzlaf – Perry – Rakell13:43
xG 0.20–1.15 (15%)attempts 9–20goals 0–3
Defence pairs
- Del Zotto – Fowler4:51
xG 0.15–0.17 (47%)attempts 3–7goals 0–1
- Megna – Montour2:04
xG 0.01–0.20 (5%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0
- Del Zotto – Megna7:03
xG 0.13–0.33 (28%)attempts 4–8goals 0–0
Montréal Canadiens
Forward lines
- bestArmia – Lehkonen – Kotkaniemi10:34
xG 0.82–0.10 (89%)attempts 13–7goals 1–0
- Gallagher – Danault – Drouin10:08
xG 0.50–0.20 (72%)attempts 11–6goals 3–0
- Peca – Hudon – Domi10:16
xG 0.38–0.20 (65%)attempts 9–12goals 0–0
- Deslauriers – Chaput – Agostino9:27
xG 0.23–0.40 (36%)attempts 9–6goals 0–1
Defence pairs
- bestPetry – Reilly14:17
xG 0.92–0.20 (82%)attempts 19–11goals 1–0
- Weber – Mete14:32
xG 0.95–0.36 (73%)attempts 22–14goals 3–1
- Benn – Kulak15:41
xG 0.24–0.50 (32%)attempts 7–15goals 0–0
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
MTL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MTL is favoured, below it ANA. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Montréal Canadiens win this game 79% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (MTL − ANA), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).