Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Feb 5, 2019·Pepsi Center, Denver

Columbus Blue Jackets 6, Colorado Avalanche 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Columbus Blue Jackets win this game 72% of the time.

COL winsCBJ wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CBJ26112319637
COL21111405330

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:53CBJOliver BjorkstrandAssists: Alexander Wennberg, David Savard · Wrap-around, 0.03 xG1–0
  2. P1 11:59COLErik JohnsonUnassisted · Slap, 0.03 xG1–1
  3. P1 13:02CBJPierre-Luc DuboisAssists: Scott Harrington, Dean Kukan · Backhand, 0.25 xG2–1
  4. P1 18:37COLNikita ZadorovAssists: Nathan MacKinnon, Erik Johnson · Slap, 0.02 xG2–2
  5. P2 14:06COLSamuel GirardAssists: Gabriel Bourque, Sheldon Dries · Wrist, 0.06 xG2–3
  6. P2 19:41CBJCam AtkinsonAssists: Artemi Panarin · Wrist, 0.13 xG3–3
  7. P3 10:29CBJJosh AndersonGWGAssists: Boone Jenner, Dean Kukan · Backhand, 0.20 xG4–3
  8. P3 12:11CBJAlexander WennbergPPAssists: Seth Jones, Anthony Duclair · Wrist, 0.03 xG5–3
  9. P3 18:32CBJPierre-Luc DuboisENAssists: Zach Werenski, Boone Jenner · Wrist, 0.77 xG6–3
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 15:02CBJSeth Jones: Tripping2 min
  2. P2 3:39CBJPierre-Luc Dubois: Slashing2 min
  3. P3 0:29COLIan Cole: Boarding2 min
  4. P3 5:18CBJDavid Savard: Interference2 min
  5. P3 10:29COLSven Andrighetto: Delaying game bench2 min · PPG
  6. P3 12:30CBJBoone Jenner: High sticking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CBJ00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0COL
46% to win54% to win
← CBJ attackCOL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Dubois won the faceoff against MacKinnon
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CBJCOL
37Shots on goal30
3.2Expected goals2.1
59Shot attempts50
28Faceoffs won31
2Power plays4
8Penalty minutes4
23Hits25
14Blocked shots14
8Giveaways9
9Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Columbus Blue Jackets

Forward lines

  1. bestFoligno – Atkinson – Dubois3:34

    xG 0.28–0.09 (75%)attempts 4–4goals 1–0

  2. Foligno – Jenner – Anderson3:02

    xG 0.25–0.11 (70%)attempts 5–5goals 1–1

  3. Nash – Sedlak – Hannikainen5:58

    xG 0.11–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–0goals 0–0

  4. Atkinson – Panarin – Dubois7:39

    xG 0.39–0.34 (53%)attempts 15–8goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestJones – Werenski18:52

    xG 0.38–0.30 (56%)attempts 20–13goals 0–1

  2. Harrington – Kukan9:11

    xG 0.43–0.47 (48%)attempts 7–7goals 1–1

  3. Savard – Nutivaara12:40

    xG 0.25–0.58 (30%)attempts 12–21goals 2–1

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestSoderberg – Calvert – Nieto9:12

    xG 0.32–0.16 (67%)attempts 10–9goals 1–1

  2. Bourque – Andrighetto – Dries5:14

    xG 0.17–0.04 (79%)attempts 4–3goals 1–0

  3. Wilson – Kerfoot – Compher8:08

    xG 0.15–0.13 (54%)attempts 5–7goals 0–0

  4. Landeskog – MacKinnon – Rantanen14:25

    xG 0.59–0.59 (50%)attempts 17–17goals 1–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestJohnson – Cole12:22

    xG 0.60–0.14 (81%)attempts 12–10goals 1–0

  2. Johnson – Girard4:31

    xG 0.39–0.25 (61%)attempts 7–3goals 0–0

  3. Cole – Nemeth2:50

    xG 0.00–0.02 (0%)attempts 0–2goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

COL 2.1 xGCBJ 3.2 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

COLCBJ

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

COL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line COL is favoured, below it CBJ. Dots are goals.

Excitement 87/100 · #183 of 1271 this seasonSwing 2.05 · 9 goals in reachComeback index 23% (winner's lowest chance)
CBJ 100%5050%50COL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +34 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Columbus Blue Jackets win this game 72% of the time.

COL winsCBJ wins

Simulated goal difference (COL − CBJ), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).