Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Feb 9, 2019·Wells Fargo Center, Philadelphia

Anaheim Ducks 2, Philadelphia Flyers 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 52% of the time.

PHI winsANA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
ANA01219111232
PHI414013213640

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 2:44PHIPhil VaroneAssists: Michael Raffl · Wrist, 0.11 xG0–1
  2. P1 10:24PHISean CouturierAssists: Robert Hagg, Phil Varone · Wrist, 0.04 xG0–2
  3. P1 11:44PHIMichael RafflSHGWGAssists: Scott Laughton, Andrew MacDonald · Wrist, 0.04 xG0–3
  4. P1 17:46PHIOskar LindblomAssists: Sean Couturier, Jakub Voracek · Tip-in, 0.15 xG0–4
  5. P2 0:51ANAAdam HenriquePPAssists: Nick Ritchie, Ryan Getzlaf · Wrist, 0.21 xG1–4
  6. P3 4:57ANANick RitchiePPAssists: Ryan Getzlaf, Rickard Rakell · Wrist, 0.03 xG2–4
  7. P3 12:15PHINolan PatrickPPAssists: Sean Couturier, Travis Konecny · Backhand, 0.23 xG2–5
  8. P3 18:49PHITravis KonecnyAssists: Travis Sanheim, James van Riemsdyk · Wrist, 0.34 xG2–6
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 10:54PHIOskar Lindblom: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 15:15ANABrandon Montour: Interference2 min
  3. P1 19:53ANACorey Perry: Roughing2 min
  4. P1 19:53PHIRobert Hagg: Slashing2 min · PPG
  5. P1 19:53PHIRadko Gudas: Roughing2 min
  6. P2 0:51PHIJakub Voracek: Delaying game bench2 min
  7. P2 15:23ANARyan Kesler: Hooking2 min
  8. P3 2:19ANARyan Getzlaf: High sticking2 min
  9. P3 3:36PHIShayne Gostisbehere: Tripping2 min · PPG
  10. P3 5:53ANABrandon Montour: Holding2 min
  11. P3 10:28ANAJosh Manson: Tripping2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ANA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PHI
46% to win54% to win
← ANA attackPHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Couturier won the faceoff against Getzlaf
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ANAPHI
32Shots on goal40
2.9Expected goals3.1
62Shot attempts68
28Faceoffs won36
4Power plays5
12Penalty minutes10
14Hits10
15Blocked shots19
7Giveaways10
4Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestSilfverberg – Shore – Rowney9:27

    xG 1.18–0.04 (97%)attempts 25–1goals 0–0

  2. Getzlaf – Perry – Rakell12:39

    xG 0.64–0.75 (46%)attempts 13–14goals 0–1

  3. Kesler – Grant – Gibbons4:33

    xG 0.05–0.29 (14%)attempts 4–7goals 0–2

  4. Henrique – Ritchie – Sprong10:03

    xG 0.14–0.60 (19%)attempts 5–13goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestLindholm – Montour9:45

    xG 0.78–0.23 (78%)attempts 13–10goals 0–1

  2. Del Zotto – Montour2:47

    xG 0.50–0.26 (66%)attempts 4–5goals 0–0

  3. Fowler – Manson11:07

    xG 0.67–0.44 (61%)attempts 15–9goals 0–1

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestVoracek – Couturier – Lindblom8:36

    xG 0.53–0.34 (61%)attempts 11–8goals 1–0

  2. Varone – Raffl – Vorobyev6:09

    xG 0.13–0.03 (80%)attempts 7–4goals 1–0

  3. Giroux – van Riemsdyk – Konecny8:14

    xG 0.26–0.49 (34%)attempts 9–8goals 0–0

  4. Simmonds – Laughton – Patrick8:07

    xG 0.14–0.98 (12%)attempts 4–15goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSanheim – Provorov17:00

    xG 1.20–0.46 (72%)attempts 22–11goals 2–0

  2. MacDonald – Gostisbehere11:49

    xG 0.33–0.46 (42%)attempts 10–14goals 0–0

  3. Gudas – Hagg13:02

    xG 0.50–1.26 (29%)attempts 14–21goals 2–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PHI 3.1 xGANA 2.9 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PHIANA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PHI is favoured, below it ANA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 62/100 · #477 of 1271 this seasonSwing 0.64 · 6 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 54% (winner's lowest chance)
ANA 100%5050%50PHI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +14 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 52% of the time.

PHI winsANA wins

Simulated goal difference (PHI − ANA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).