Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Feb 10, 2019·Bridgestone Arena, Nashville

St. Louis Blues 5, Nashville Predators 4 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 59% of the time.

NSH winsSTL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
STL043151911529
NSH0811731900444

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 2:56STLAlex PietrangeloPPAssists: Robert Thomas, Ryan O'Reilly · Snap, 0.11 xG1–0
  2. P2 4:41STLVladimir TarasenkoAssists: Jay Bouwmeester, Colton Parayko · Wrist, 0.04 xG2–0
  3. P2 5:06NSHViktor ArvidssonAssists: Ryan Ellis, Roman Josi · Wrist, 0.17 xG2–1
  4. P2 5:51STLTyler BozakAssists: Jaden Schwartz, Alexander Steen · Backhand, 0.06 xG3–1
  5. P3 2:48NSHRoman JosiAssists: Kevin Fiala, Ryan Ellis · Wrap-around, 0.06 xG3–2
  6. P3 6:10NSHViktor ArvidssonAssists: Ryan Johansen, Mattias Ekholm · Snap, 0.18 xG3–3
  7. P3 7:06STLVladimir TarasenkoAssists: Ryan O'Reilly, Jay Bouwmeester · Deflected, 0.02 xG4–3
  8. P3 12:53NSHFilip ForsbergAssists: Ryan Johansen · Wrist, 0.14 xG4–4
  9. OT 0:16STLVladimir TarasenkoGWGUnassisted · Wrist, 0.15 xG5–4
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 7:32NSHKevin Fiala: Slashing2 min
  2. P1 10:13STLJoel Edmundson: Slashing2 min
  3. P1 14:31NSHP.K. Subban: Elbowing2 min
  4. P2 2:35NSHCody McLeod: Roughing2 min · PPG
  5. P2 13:06STLMackenzie MacEachern: Interference2 min
  6. P2 16:30NSHRyan Johansen: Slashing2 min
  7. P2 17:25STLVladimir Tarasenko: Elbowing2 min
  8. P3 9:37STLAlex Pietrangelo: Roughing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

STL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0NSH
46% to win54% to win
← STL attackNSH attack →
  1. P1 20:00O'Reilly won the faceoff against Johansen
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

STLNSH
29Shots on goal44
2.3Expected goals2.8
51Shot attempts85
39Faceoffs won40
4Power plays4
8Penalty minutes8
15Hits28
28Blocked shots7
7Giveaways20
2Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

St. Louis Blues

Forward lines

  1. bestSteen – Bozak – Schwartz10:01

    xG 0.41–0.14 (75%)attempts 12–8goals 1–0

  2. Maroon – Sundqvist – Sanford8:16

    xG 0.36–0.18 (67%)attempts 6–11goals 0–0

  3. O'Reilly – Schenn – Tarasenko10:42

    xG 0.66–0.54 (55%)attempts 15–15goals 2–2

  4. MacEachern – Barbashev – Thomas4:12

    xG 0.00–0.17 (2%)attempts 1–8goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestBouwmeester – Parayko20:03

    xG 1.06–0.57 (65%)attempts 22–22goals 3–1

  2. Bortuzzo – Dunn7:56

    xG 0.23–0.24 (48%)attempts 5–12goals 0–0

  3. Pietrangelo – Edmundson13:46

    xG 0.33–0.93 (26%)attempts 12–24goals 0–2

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestJohansen – Forsberg – Arvidsson14:03

    xG 1.02–0.49 (67%)attempts 27–15goals 2–1

  2. Boyle – McLeod – Hartman2:04

    xG 0.08–0.09 (48%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

  3. Turris – Smith – Fiala9:33

    xG 0.07–0.12 (36%)attempts 8–5goals 0–1

  4. Bonino – Jarnkrok – Sissons9:30

    xG 0.28–0.54 (34%)attempts 12–11goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestJosi – Ellis14:17

    xG 0.80–0.41 (66%)attempts 21–14goals 3–1

  2. Subban – Ekholm18:34

    xG 0.65–0.68 (49%)attempts 27–17goals 0–1

  3. Hamhuis – Weber10:18

    xG 0.27–0.44 (38%)attempts 13–6goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

NSH 2.8 xGSTL 2.3 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

NSHSTL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

NSH's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NSH is favoured, below it STL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 97/100 · #44 of 1271 this seasonSwing 2.56 · 9 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 45% (winner's lowest chance)
STL 100%5050%50NSH 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +34 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 59% of the time.

NSH winsSTL wins

Simulated goal difference (NSH − STL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).